On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 02:36:20PM +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> On 12/07/2011 02:19 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
[snip]
> > if (*i2cctl & IXGBE_I2C_DATA_IN)
> > - data = 1;
> > + data = true;
> > else
> > - data = 0;
> > + data = false;
> >
> > return
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 07:20 +, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 02:36:20PM +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> > On 12/07/2011 02:19 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > > if (*i2cctl & IXGBE_I2C_DATA_IN)
> > > - data = 1;
> > > + data = true;
> > > else
> > > - d
On 12/07/2011 02:19 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 14:08 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
>> I'm not good at script, if you are interested, we can work together to
>> fix all the remain cases, and send out some patches.
>
> You should try coccinelle and spatch.
>
Hi, Joe
I have not u
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 14:08 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> I'm not good at script, if you are interested, we can work together to
> fix all the remain cases, and send out some patches.
You should try coccinelle and spatch.
If you run the script, this is the intel output.
drivers/net/ethernet/inte
On 12/07/2011 02:01 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 12:49 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
>> On 12/07/2011 12:14 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 19:43 -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 18:33 -0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> From: Michael Wang
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 12:49 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> On 12/07/2011 12:14 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 19:43 -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 18:33 -0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> >>> From: Michael Wang
> >>> Use true and false instead of 1 and 0 when as
On 12/07/2011 12:14 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 19:43 -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 18:33 -0800, Michael Wang wrote:
>>> From: Michael Wang
>>> Use true and false instead of 1 and 0 when assign value to a bool type
>>> variable.
>> Thanks Michael, I have a
How do I program the eeprom on the 82574L under linux? I have a new part on an
embedded product and right now the kernel is telling me:
Dec 5 17:39:03 foo kernel: :03:00.0: :03:00.0: The NVM Checksum Is Not
Valid
This seems to prevent the interface from attaching, and so prevents me f
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 19:43 -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 18:33 -0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> > From: Michael Wang
> > Use true and false instead of 1 and 0 when assign value to a bool type
> > variable.
> Thanks Michael, I have added your patch to my queue of e1000e patches.
From: Michael Wang
Use true and false instead of 1 and 0 when assign value to a bool type
variable.
This patch is try to keep the style of driver, and according to David's
suggestion on patch "e1000e: Avoid wrong check on TX hang":
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=132296931201839&w=2
v2: add
On 12/07/2011 04:10 AM, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 17:04:09 -0800
> Michael Wang wrote:
>> Actually, I make this change because of my last patch:
>> e1000e: Avoid wrong check on TX hang
>>
>> And I get the suggestion from David, the mail like below.
>> He want me to use true and
sending this again as it didn't show up on the list for some reason (probably
rejected because I pgp signed the message)
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Brandeburg [mailto:jesse.brandeb...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 12:10 PM
To: Michael Wang
Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourcefo
12 matches
Mail list logo
