On 1/7/2012 12:25 AM, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
> Pratyush,
>
> Sorry I got your name reversed.
> Are you using in-kernel driver or one from Sourceforge.
I am using in-kernel driver from kernel 2.6.37.
> Please send me output of ethtool -i ethx.
root@192.168.1.10:~# ethtool -i eth0
driver: e1000e
ve
Greg,
Thank you for the clarification!
David
On 1/9/2012 12:59 PM, Rose, Gregory V wrote:
> David,
>
> The results being reported are expected.
>
>>Supports auto-negotiation: No ( We think this should be Yes )
> Actually no... The virtual function (VF) device does not do any
> auto-negoti
>-Original Message-
>From: Kirsher, Jeffrey T
>Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 9:07 PM
>To: Jesper Juhl; Skidmore, Donald C
>Cc: e1000-devel Mailing List; David S. Miller; Brandeburg, Jesse; netdev
>Subject: Re: Intel ixgbe: uninitialized variable use in
>ixgbe_non_sfp_link_config()
>
>On
David,
The results being reported are expected.
> Supports auto-negotiation: No ( We think this should be Yes )
Actually no... The virtual function (VF) device does not do any
auto-negotiation. It requires the physical function (PF) device to do that on
its behalf.
> Advertised auto-n
Greg,
Thank you for your help!
In the OEL 5.5 guest domain, its ethtool reports strange results of
virtual interfaces of Twinville:
Supports auto-negotiation: No ( We think this should be Yes )
Advertised auto-negotiation: No ( We think this should be Yes )
Port: Unknown! (255) ( We think
On 09/01/2012 17:19, Wyborny, Carolyn wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chris Boot [mailto:bo...@bootc.net]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 8:58 AM
>> To: Wyborny, Carolyn
>> Cc: Nicolas de Pesloüan; netdev; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: igb + balance-rr + b
David,
We've found that if we use RHEL 5.5 as the guest then the bug still occurs but
if we upgrade the guest OS to RHEL 5.6 then it does not occur. So it does not
appear to be a driver bug. It looks like some issue with RHEL 5.5 and OEL 5.5.
We suggest upgrading to 5.6.
Thanks,
- Greg
> -
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Cochran [mailto:richardcoch...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 11:38 AM
> To: net...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Keller, Jacob E; Kirsher,
> Jeffrey T; Ronciak, John; John Stultz; Thomas Gleixner
> Subject: [PAT
Hi Carolyn,
Please see comments inline:
On 1/9/2012 7:54 AM, Wyborny, Carolyn wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Azher Mughal [mailto:az...@hep.caltech.edu]
>> Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 6:59 AM
>> To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Wyborny, Carolyn
>> Subject: Linux igb issue
>>
>> Hi Al
>-Original Message-
>From: Chris Boot [mailto:bo...@bootc.net]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 8:58 AM
>To: Wyborny, Carolyn
>Cc: Nicolas de Pesloüan; netdev; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: igb + balance-rr + bridge + IPv6 = no go without
>promiscuous mode
>
>On 04/01/
>-Original Message-
>From: Zoop [mailto:junkm...@lone.ath.cx]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 7:07 AM
>To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: [E1000-devel] Problem with 82575GB Card and packets/s
>capabilities.
>
>I have a Dell 710 server using two 82575GB Intel Quad cards. I
>-Original Message-
>From: Azher Mughal [mailto:az...@hep.caltech.edu]
>Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2012 6:59 AM
>To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Wyborny, Carolyn
>Subject: Linux igb issue
>
>Hi All,
>
>I downloaded the latest driver from sourceforge ver 3.3.6 and it has
>your patch. Removing the
12 matches
Mail list logo