Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe-3.7.21 fixes "SR-IOV critical bug" -- any info on what it is?

2012-08-17 Thread Greg Rose
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:09:05 -0600 Chris Friesen wrote: > > I was looking at the comments for the ixgbe driver versions and > noticed that 3.7.21 lists "SR-IOV critical bug". We're using SR-IOV > so I'd like to know if this is something I need to push for updating. > > I diffed it against the

[E1000-devel] ixgbe-3.7.21 fixes "SR-IOV critical bug" -- any info on what it is?

2012-08-17 Thread Chris Friesen
I was looking at the comments for the ixgbe driver versions and noticed that 3.7.21 lists "SR-IOV critical bug". We're using SR-IOV so I'd like to know if this is something I need to push for updating. I diffed it against the previous version and it looks like the changes are mostly vlan-rela

Re: [E1000-devel] 82599, queues, interrupts, etc.

2012-08-17 Thread Chris Friesen
On 08/17/2012 08:45 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote: > > The RSS option was updated a while back to control the number of queues > that a workload can be distributed over in a non-DCB mode. Setting it > to 0 is only going to give you one queue per port. > > If you are wanting the behaviour to be that al

Re: [E1000-devel] 82599, queues, interrupts, etc.

2012-08-17 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 08/16/2012 04:25 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: > On 08/16/2012 05:07 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: >> On 08/16/2012 04:00 PM, Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P wrote: >>> If you disable RSS, then all non-matched FDIR flows will go to queue 0 >>> by default. If you're using the upstream driver, you'll need to >>> co