Re: [E1000-devel] MAC addresses with igb and I350-F4 Sgl

2012-10-01 Thread Nathan Angelacos
Tushar and Akeem, > Would you try latest out of tree igb driver to see if issue persist with it? Stock Debian 3.3.x kernel worked Alpine Linux 3.3.8 kernel worked Upgraded Vyatta from (3.0.23 kernel [stable]) to 3.3.8 [unstable/pacifica] and it works. In the end it was a Vyatta/kernel bug. Than

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe bug specific to x520 with bridging + lro?

2012-10-01 Thread Nathan March
On 10/1/2012 3:45 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote: > On 10/01/2012 03:22 PM, Nathan March wrote: >> Sorry, forgot to mention that this is confirmed on the latest driver >> from sourceforge (3.10.17) >> >> - Nathan >> >> On 10/1/2012 2:42 PM, Nathan March wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Running into what seem

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe bug specific to x520 with bridging + lro?

2012-10-01 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 10/01/2012 03:22 PM, Nathan March wrote: > Sorry, forgot to mention that this is confirmed on the latest driver > from sourceforge (3.10.17) > > - Nathan > > On 10/1/2012 2:42 PM, Nathan March wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Running into what seems to be a very strange bug, that's specific only >> to

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe bug specific to x520 with bridging + lro?

2012-10-01 Thread Nathan March
Both the 520's and 540's are using cat6a to a pair of arista 7050T's - Nathan On 10/1/2012 3:40 PM, Ronciak, John wrote: > So what kind of cables/connector do you have on the x520's? The X540 are > copper but what's the connection type on the ones that aren't working? > > Cheers, > John > > >>

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe bug specific to x520 with bridging + lro?

2012-10-01 Thread Ronciak, John
So what kind of cables/connector do you have on the x520's? The X540 are copper but what's the connection type on the ones that aren't working? Cheers, John > -Original Message- > From: Nathan March [mailto:nat...@gt.net] > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 3:22 PM > To: e1000-devel@lists

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe bug specific to x520 with bridging + lro?

2012-10-01 Thread Nathan March
Sorry, forgot to mention that this is confirmed on the latest driver from sourceforge (3.10.17) - Nathan On 10/1/2012 2:42 PM, Nathan March wrote: > Hi All, > > Running into what seems to be a very strange bug, that's specific only > to the X520-T2 and not the X540-T2. Configuration is a xen hos

[E1000-devel] ixgbe bug specific to x520 with bridging + lro?

2012-10-01 Thread Nathan March
Hi All, Running into what seems to be a very strange bug, that's specific only to the X520-T2 and not the X540-T2. Configuration is a xen host with a X520-T2 setup with bonding + bridging. eth3/eth4 -> bond0 -> pvlan460 -> bridged made as vlan460. I've compiled with CFLAGS_EXTRA="-DIXGBE_NO_LR

Re: [E1000-devel] 82574L issues with e1000e

2012-10-01 Thread Ronciak, John
Thanks Kirstian, We'll take a look at this and try a repro here in our lab. In the mean time can you please get us on EEPROM dump using ethtool for the device in question? We'd like to see if it is programmed correctly. Thanks. Cheers, John > -Original Message- > From: Kristian K

[E1000-devel] Photos

2012-10-01 Thread Kera Aldrich
Hi, as promised your photos - http://www.ccisr.org/dcim.htm -- Got visibility? Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like. Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk