On 11/14/12 11:45, Dave, Tushar N wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Joe Jin [mailto:joe@oracle.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 6:48 PM
>> To: Dave, Tushar N
>> Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sf.net; net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>> ker...@vger.kernel.org; Mary Mcgrath
>> Subject: R
This is a description of rescuing an older intel e1000 hardware that had
a corrupted EEPROM. Maybe someone else can use the info from this
success to create their own rescue.
I stumbled across a homeless Dell Precision 650, and since it looked like
an interesting (old) target to use for boot test
Hi Pawel,
Sorry about late response. We flashed EEPROM you sent us on X520-DA2 and ran an
overnight stress test against couple different switch vendors and have not been
able to repro.
This is closest as we can get as we don't have Juniper EX4500 in house. We'll
continue to investigate with o
On 11/14/2012 02:23 PM, Williams, Mitch A wrote:
> NAK, at least the second half. The IGBVF_FLAG_RX_LB_VLAN_BSWAP tag is
> specifically to work around an errata on the i350. This change would
> break the 82576.
I see that you're explicitly checking for loopback packets and only
converting from bi
NAK, at least the second half. The IGBVF_FLAG_RX_LB_VLAN_BSWAP tag is
specifically to work around an errata on the i350. This change would break the
82576.
Chris, I'm working on this right now and should have a setup ready for repro by
the end of the day. Carolyn and I will work together to get
There seems to be a bug in the igbvf sourceforge driver. In igbvf_receive_skb()
we're ANDing the big-endian vlan ID with the little-endian mask.
Also, I think the criteria for setting IGBVF_FLAG_RX_LB_VLAN_BSWAP is incorrect.
The 82576 datasheet also indicates that the VLAN tag is big endian. Sin
Hello Ratheesh,
I have no kernel 2.6.29.1 and any ia-64 harware, but looked on modern
(3.6) kernel sources.
From arch/ia64/include/asm/io.h you can see that virt_to_phys and
virt_to_bus are actually the same function.
It's implementation is to return (unsigned long) address - PAGE_OFFSET.
I g
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Greg Rose [mailto:gregory.v.r...@intel.com]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 31. Oktober 2012 17:10
> An: Richter, Andre
> Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Rauchfuss, Holm; Herber, Christian
> Betreff: Re: [E1000-devel] MSI-X capability of 82576 VFs
>
> On Wed
Hi,
I am running 2.6.29.1 on ia-64 hardware.
when i run below code in a module
void *ptr = kmalloc( 10 ,GFP_KERNEL )
i got a valid ptr ( ptr != NULL ) ..but i saw that
ptr == vitr_to_phy(ptr ) == virt_to_bus(ptr )
1. why the physical and vitrual address are same ?
2. is this sthing tha
这是一封 HTML 格式的邮件，请以网页方式查看邮件。
--
Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single
web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware,
SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day F
10 matches
Mail list logo
