On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 01:22:27PM -0500, Bill Pemberton wrote:
> drivers/net/ethernet/8390/etherh.c | 4 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/amd/am79c961a.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/i825xx/ether1.c | 8 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/seeq/ether3.c
On 11/21/2012 09:18 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 11/21/2012 09:09 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On 11/20/2012 05:05 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
>>> On 11/20/2012 04:34 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
On 11/20/2012 04:18 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
>>>
>> Also, have you checked to make sure the feature set is comp
On 11/21/2012 09:09 AM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On 11/20/2012 05:05 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
>> On 11/20/2012 04:34 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
>>> On 11/20/2012 04:18 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
>>
> Also, have you checked to make sure the feature set is comparable?
> For
> instance the E5 can suppo
On 11/20/2012 05:05 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 11/20/2012 04:34 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
>> On 11/20/2012 04:18 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
>
Also, have you checked to make sure the feature set is comparable?
For
instance the E5 can support VT-d. If that is enabled it can have a
negati
This is getting painful to review; why couldn't all the changes to one
set of drivers be grouped together? I'm having to search out the same
drivers I'm responsible for many times in this patch set to do a review,
and it's getting extremely tiresome and probably becoming more probable
that I'll ma