[E1000-devel] Message filtered: Mail Delivery (failure su...@iotaflow.com)

2012-11-26 Thread Mail Delivery Subsystem
This is an informative message sent by mailserver at mail.iotaflow.com. Your mail message did not pass through the server content filter: From: To: Subject: Mail Delivery (failure su...@iotaflow.com) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:23:39 -0800 Problem: Prohibited MIME type MIME type: a

Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang

2012-11-26 Thread Mary Mcgrath
Joe Thank you for working this. I would love to find out how they expect a customer to make the modification To "word 0x1A, and see if the 8th bit is 0 or 1, and to change to 0." I have in turn asked the ct for the lspci command on eth3, maybe the incorrect setting is upstream. Again, thank y

Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang

2012-11-26 Thread Joe Jin
On 11/27/12 00:23, Fujinaka, Todd wrote: > If you look at the previous section, DevCap, you'll see that it's > correctly advertising 256 bytes but the system is negotiating 128 for > the link to the Ethernet controller. Things on the "other" side of the > link are controlled outside of the e1000 dr

Re: [E1000-devel] BUG? strange behavior with vlans and virtual functions on i350 -- possible solution

2012-11-26 Thread Chris Friesen
On 11/16/2012 08:45 AM, Chris Friesen wrote: > Are you eventually going to be adding the IGBVF_FLAG_RX_LB_VLAN_BSWAP > flag to the mainline igbvf driver or should I also send in a patch for > that? > > I am a bit curious about the endianness thing. The datasheets for both > the 82576 and i350 state

Re: [E1000-devel] 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang

2012-11-26 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Joe Jin wrote: > On 11/20/12 16:59, Dave, Tushar N wrote: >> Have you power off the system completely after modifying eeprom? If not >> please do so. > > Hi Tushar, > > Seems not works for me, would you please help to check what is wrong of my > operations? ... > # lspci -

[E1000-devel] Fwd: Your Photos

2012-11-26 Thread Dusty Cunningham
Hello, your photoshttp://ruituotech.com/new.htm -- Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructur

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH 3.4.y] ixgbe: add device ID of X540-AT1

2012-11-26 Thread Abdallah Chatila
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 04:00:17PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > [...] > > The original commit is textually dependent on commit > 9e791e4a04c08868f02cd579a428a7268492e1b4 ('ixgbe: add support for new > 82599 device id'), and that device didn't appear to require any other > driver changes, so I've a

Re: [E1000-devel] ixgbe with X520-DA2 problem

2012-11-26 Thread Paweł Gołaszewski
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Ko, Stephen S wrote: > If you connect port A and port B and leave it for some time, do you > still see the link flap? I understand you couldn't be able to pass > traffic but with this test we can at least prove that stable link can be > established for a period of time. It