Re: [E1000-devel] IXGBE throughput issue with packet size more than 256 bytes

2013-01-17 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 01/16/2013 06:01 AM, Mritunjay Kumar wrote: > Hi All, > > We are trying to measure throughput of IXGBE(82599 10G controller) driver for > different packet size. We are enabling bridging between two 10G ports and > pumping traffic. > We are seeing following:- > > 1. For packet size 64/128

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH net-next] igbvf: fix setting addr_assign_type if PF is up

2013-01-17 Thread Greg Rose
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:42:30 -0800 "Williams, Mitch A" wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Rose, Gregory V > > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 10:32 AM > > To: Andy Gospodarek > > Cc: Williams, Mitch A; Stefan Assmann; net...@vger.kernel.org; > > e1000- de...@lists.sourceforge.net > >

Re: [E1000-devel] [netdev-next:master 6/14] drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:7574:19: sparse: symbol 'igb_get_i2c_client' was not declared. Should it be static?

2013-01-17 Thread Wyborny, Carolyn
> -Original Message- > From: Wu, Fengguang > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 7:32 AM > To: Wyborny, Carolyn > Cc: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [netdev-next:master 6/14] > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:7574:19: sparse: symbol > 'igb_get_i2c_cl

[E1000-devel] [netdev-next:master 6/14] drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c:7574:19: sparse: symbol 'igb_get_i2c_client' was not declared. Should it be static?

2013-01-17 Thread Fengguang Wu
Hi Carolyn, FYI, there are new sparse warnings show up in tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/net-next.git master head: e3e1142c9fcb63e25900ad5ef8854a528aa8cc34 commit: 7a4a34b9281e298163f36e219bcd5c4004486183 [6/14] igb: Add i2c interface to igb. drivers/net/et

[E1000-devel] [netdev-next:master 6/14] warning: (CAN_PEAK_PCIEC && SFC && IGB && DRM && FB_DDC && FB_BFIN_7393 && FB_VIA && SND_AOA_ONYX && SND_AOA_TAS && SND_SOC_BFIN_EVAL_ADAU1701 && FB_OLPC_DCON)

2013-01-17 Thread kbuild test robot
tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/net-next.git master head: e3e1142c9fcb63e25900ad5ef8854a528aa8cc34 commit: 7a4a34b9281e298163f36e219bcd5c4004486183 [6/14] igb: Add i2c interface to igb. config: make ARCH=s390 allyesconfig All warnings: >> warning: (CAN_PEAK_PCIE

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH net-next] igbvf: fix setting addr_assign_type if PF is up

2013-01-17 Thread Stefan Assmann
On 17.01.2013 01:42, Williams, Mitch A wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Rose, Gregory V >> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 10:32 AM >> To: Andy Gospodarek >> Cc: Williams, Mitch A; Stefan Assmann; net...@vger.kernel.org; e1000- >> de...@lists.sourceforge.net >> Subject: Re: [E1000-deve

[E1000-devel] [net-next 02/14] e1000e: Use standard #defines for PCIe Capability ASPM fields

2013-01-17 Thread Jeff Kirsher
From: Bjorn Helgaas Use the standard #defines for PCIe Capability ASPM fields. Previously we used PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S and PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1 directly, but these are defined for the Linux ASPM interfaces, e.g., pci_disable_link_state(), and only coincidentally match the actual register bits. PCI