On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 06:35:04PM +, Ronciak, John wrote:
| The request for stats should be happening only once every 2 seconds. Do
| you have a script pounding on getting stats repeatedly? Are you sure that
| it's the request for stats that is causing the issue you are seeing or are
| you g
It's not on RHEL, it's in the MRG Realtime kernel, which is a kernel
with the PREEMPT_RT patchset applied. It's a layered product where the
RT kernel runs on a RHEL6 user-space.
We don't really have a forum for this, which is why I asked Luis to
reach out upstream.
In answer to your question, a
The request for stats should be happening only once every 2 seconds. Do you
have a script pounding on getting stats repeatedly? Are you sure that it's the
request for stats that is causing the issue you are seeing or are you guessing
that this is the case? Can you make this happen without bon
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:46:31PM +, Wyborny, Carolyn wrote:
| > -Original Message-
| > From: Luis Claudio R. Goncalves [mailto:lclau...@uudg.org]
| > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 11:45 AM
| > To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
| > Cc: Clark Williams
| > Subject: Re: [E1000-devel]
Hi e1000e-devel;
Steven (cc-ed) noticed an imbalance in semaphore put/get for
82573-based NICs. Don't we need something like the following
(untested) patch?
From: Steven La
Acked-by: Arthur Kepner
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/82571.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e
BTW, this is in reference to using ping with larger sized frames.
Cheers,
John
> -Original Message-
> From: Ronciak, John [mailto:john.ronc...@intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 9:40 AM
> To: Jagdish Motwani; e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] igb: canno
Yes the patch is still needed. Setting the MTU smaller than a normal packet
will cause the frame to be IP fragmented. So you should be seeing at least 2
packets on the wire being IP fragments. Use wireshark (or something similar)
to make sure those packets make it to on to the wire.
Cheers,
On 07/12/2013 01:56 AM, Jagdish Motwani wrote:
> Hi list,
> I am facing a strange issue with igb driver.
>
> If i set my mtu to 1000, then ping -s 1200 does not work. (the same
> thing works with e1000e interface)
>
> On further debugging, i reached
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/l
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:26:32 +0530
Jagdish Motwani wrote:
> Hi list,
> I am facing a strange issue with igb driver.
>
> If i set my mtu to 1000, then ping -s 1200 does not work. (the same
> thing works with e1000e interface)
>
> On further debugging, i reached
> http://git.kern
Hi!
> > > Pavel's ThinkPad X60 has two NICs: Intel 82573L and Intel PRO/Wireless
> > > 3945ABG. I'm pretty sure the problem he's reporting is with the 82573L.
> > > Ping
> > > times are bad (~100msec) when ASPM is enabled, as reported by lspci.
> > >
> > > On Pavel's system, the FADT says we s
Hi!
> [+cc Jeff, Jesse, et al, e1000-devel]
>
> Holy cow, you guys have a lot of folks listed in MAINTAINERS for Intel
> drivers :) This is an ASPM question, if that helps narrow down the
> folks interested.
> >> If ASPM is enabled for a
> >> device, e.g., your NIC, the link may be put in a low
Hi list,
I am facing a strange issue with igb driver.
If i set my mtu to 1000, then ping -s 1200 does not work. (the same
thing works with e1000e interface)
On further debugging, i reached
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ec54d7d6e40b04c16
12 matches
Mail list logo
