Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH] i40e: don't enable and init FCOE by default when do PF reset

2015-01-13 Thread ethan zhao
Vasu, On 2015/1/14 3:38, Dev, Vasu wrote: >> -Original Message- > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c > index a5f2660..a2572cc 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c > +++ b/drivers

Re: [E1000-devel] [linux-nics] Solved: Re: ixgbe/linux/sparc perf issues

2015-01-13 Thread Sowmini Varadhan
On (01/13/15 16:58), David Miller wrote: > From: Sowmini Varadhan > Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:45:30 -0500 > > > On (01/13/15 01:08), Tantilov, Emil S wrote: > >> Relaxed ordering was disabled due to an issue with some chipsets. There > >> is a comment to that effect when enabling relaxed ordering

[E1000-devel] Issue with linuxptp and ixgbe 3.23.2

2015-01-13 Thread Scott Silverman
I'm having trouble getting PTP (ptp4l) running with the latest ixgbe driver. I am getting "timed out while polling for tx timestamp" when I try and start up ptp4l. I've tried increasing the tx_timestamp_timeout from the default of 1 to 1000, but the result is the same. On kernel 3.10 it works nor

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH] i40e: don't enable and init FCOE by default when do PF reset

2015-01-13 Thread Dev, Vasu
> -Original Message- > >> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c > >> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c > >> > index a5f2660..a2572cc 100644 > >> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c > >> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_main.c >

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH][v3.13.y] e1000e: Fix no connectivity when driver loaded with cable out

2015-01-13 Thread Kamal Mostafa
On Wed, 2014-12-17 at 12:08 -0500, Joseph Salisbury wrote: > Hello, > > Please consider including mainline commit b20a774 in the next v3.13.y > stable release. It was included in the mainline tree as of v3.15-rc1. > It has been tested and confirmed to resolve > http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140

Re: [E1000-devel] [linux-nics] Solved: Re: ixgbe/linux/sparc perf issues

2015-01-13 Thread Sowmini Varadhan
On (01/13/15 01:08), Tantilov, Emil S wrote: > Relaxed ordering was disabled due to an issue with some chipsets. There > is a comment to that effect when enabling relaxed ordering for reads in > ixgbe_update_tx_dca(). This was done back in 2011, so I'm still trying > to dig through the details. It