Vasu,
OK, disable FCOE as default configuration as a temporary step to
make it work.
Thanks,
Ethan
On 2015/1/16 7:45, Dev, Vasu wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ethan zhao [mailto:ethan.z...@oracle.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 6:41 PM
>> To: Dev, Vasu
>> Cc: Ethan
> -Original Message-
> From: ethan zhao [mailto:ethan.z...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 6:41 PM
> To: Dev, Vasu
> Cc: Ethan Zhao; Ronciak, John; Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Allan,
> Bruce W; Wyborny, Carolyn; Skidmore, Donald C; Rose, Gregory V; Vick,
> Matthew;
On Thursday 15 January 2015 16:31:04 Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 16:18 +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > On Thursday 15 January 2015, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 14:40 +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 13 November 2014, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > > > > On
On Thursday, 15. January 2015 09:20:37 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > for the sake of completeness:
> > 1: hang
>
> This is weird : This should have same effect then GRO off (at most one
> segment per packet)
I thought so, too. OTOH the code path was changed from
"goto merge" to "return -E2BIG". I didn'
On Thursday, 15. January 2015 08:00:58 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Please apply this patch, and try to lower
> /proc/sys/net/core/gro_max_frags and see if this makes a difference
> (leaving GRO enabled)
>
> (start with 7 and increase it, limit being 17)
Patch applied to 3.19-rc4+.
Results:
7: hang
8
Hi,
Yes I understand the workings of this list and that's fine, and I'm
grateful for any help I receive - I just wanted to know if it's worth
waiting or not.
Regarding the counters, this server was working fine for about 20 days,
and those received packets accumulated during that interval. Sinc
Sorry, but everything on this mailing list is best effort. Please contact your
vendor for official support. There's no SLA here, and no tracking.
CentOS is not a supported OS, though it is similar enough to RHEL that things
should be working.
All attachments are stripped on the mailing list. I
On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 16:48 +0100, Thomas Jarosch wrote:
> On Thursday, 15. January 2015 07:25:32 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 15:58 +0100, Thomas Jarosch wrote:
> > > A colleague mentioned to me he saw the "Hardware Unit Hang" message
> > > every
> > > few days even running on ker
On Thursday, 15. January 2015 07:25:32 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 15:58 +0100, Thomas Jarosch wrote:
> > A colleague mentioned to me he saw the "Hardware Unit Hang" message
> > every
> > few days even running on kernel 3.4 (without your patch). Basically I'm
> > testing now if that
On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 16:18 +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> On Thursday 15 January 2015, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 14:40 +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > > On Thursday 13 November 2014, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 18:18 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > > > > From: O
On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 15:58 +0100, Thomas Jarosch wrote:
> A colleague mentioned to me he saw the "Hardware Unit Hang" message every
> few days even running on kernel 3.4 (without your patch). Basically I'm
> testing now if that's still the case with 3.19-rc4+ or not.
>
> I'm all for fixing the
On Thursday 15 January 2015, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 14:40 +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> > On Thursday 13 November 2014, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 18:18 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > > > From: Ondrej Zary
> > > > Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 23:47:25 +0100
> > >
On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 06:43 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 11:11 +0100, Thomas Jarosch wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 14. January 2015 09:20:52 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > I would try to use lower data per txd. I am not sure 24KB is really
> > > supported.
> > >
> > > ( check commit d8
On Thursday, 15. January 2015 06:43:29 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > -#define NETDEV_FRAG_PAGE_MAX_ORDER get_order(32768)
> > +#define NETDEV_FRAG_PAGE_MAX_ORDER get_order(4096)
> >
> > #define NETDEV_FRAG_PAGE_MAX_SIZE (PAGE_SIZE <<
> > NETDEV_FRAG_PAGE_MAX_ORDER) #define NETDEV_PAGECNT_MAX_BIAS
On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 14:40 +0100, Ondrej Zary wrote:
> On Thursday 13 November 2014, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 18:18 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Ondrej Zary
> > > Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 23:47:25 +0100
> > >
> > > > Enabling WoL on some Toshiba laptops (such as Porte
On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 11:11 +0100, Thomas Jarosch wrote:
> On Wednesday, 14. January 2015 09:20:52 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > I would try to use lower data per txd. I am not sure 24KB is really
> > supported.
> >
> > ( check commit d821a4c4d11ad160925dab2bb009b8444beff484 for details)
> >
> > diff -
On Wednesday, 14. January 2015 09:20:52 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> I would try to use lower data per txd. I am not sure 24KB is really
> supported.
>
> ( check commit d821a4c4d11ad160925dab2bb009b8444beff484 for details)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
> b/drivers/net/ether
17 matches
Mail list logo
