Re: [E1000-devel] SR-IOV with vxlan offload feature

2016-03-02 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Wednesday, March 2, 2016, Du, Fan wrote: > > > On 2016/3/3 3:04, Alexander Duyck wrote: > >> What do you mean by VXLAN offload? >> > > For example, a VF is exposed to a container as an interface A, > create a vxlan interface backed up by interface A, does interface > A offload vxlan traffic at

Re: [E1000-devel] SR-IOV with vxlan offload feature

2016-03-02 Thread Du, Fan
On 2016/3/3 3:04, Alexander Duyck wrote: > What do you mean by VXLAN offload? For example, a VF is exposed to a container as an interface A, create a vxlan interface backed up by interface A, does interface A offload vxlan traffic at VF hardware level just like what PF capable of? > I know I su

Re: [E1000-devel] SR-IOV with vxlan offload feature

2016-03-02 Thread Alexander Duyck
What do you mean by VXLAN offload? I know I submitted changes a few weeks back that enabled NETIF_F_HW_CSUM for the VFs. That allows them to offload the Tx checksum. The i40e and i40evf drivers support VXLAN segmentation and inner checksum offload. I believe they have that enabled for both the

[E1000-devel] SR-IOV with vxlan offload feature

2016-03-02 Thread Du, Fan
Hi, NIC experts Can I use hw vxlan offload feature for a VF exposed by SR-IOV? Thanks! -- Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35