Re: [E1000-devel] WARNING triggered by e100 driver

2013-03-19 Thread Alan Stern
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Ronciak, John wrote: > Hi Alan, > > You found the right people for looking into this. Indeed this looks > to be an issue for one of the two calls. Since we are going to have > to recode the area around the call a bit please give a bit to get a > test version ready. Once we

Re: [E1000-devel] WARNING triggered by e100 driver

2013-03-19 Thread Ronciak, John
ailto:st...@rowland.harvard.edu] > Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 9:08 AM > To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Allan, Bruce W > Cc: e1000-devel Mailing List > Subject: [E1000-devel] WARNING triggered by e100 driver > > [The Intel ethernet drivers have lots of maintainers liste

Re: [E1000-devel] WARNING triggered by e100 driver

2013-03-15 Thread Abodunrin, Akeem G
-Original Message- From: Alan Stern [mailto:st...@rowland.harvard.edu] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 9:08 AM To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Brandeburg, Jesse; Allan, Bruce W Cc: e1000-devel Mailing List Subject: [E1000-devel] WARNING triggered by e100 driver [The Intel ethernet drivers have

[E1000-devel] WARNING triggered by e100 driver

2013-03-15 Thread Alan Stern
[The Intel ethernet drivers have lots of maintainers listed, so I arbitrarily addressed this to the first three names on the list.] Ever since this check was added to the DMA API, I have been getting the following WARNING at boot: [ 45.843379] [ cut here ] [ 45.84400