Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 i82573 rotting packet?

2016-02-21 Thread Mattias Barthel
n > Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 i82573 rotting packet? > > Hi John, thanks for your answer. > > No real FW? FW can be different things in different situations, what I > meant was programmable logic which is running on the HW of the

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 i82573 rotting packet?

2016-02-21 Thread Fujinaka, Todd
: Ronciak, John Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 i82573 rotting packet? Hi John, thanks for your answer. No real FW? FW can be different things in different situations, what I meant was programmable logic which is running on the HW of the NIC, not the driver

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 i82573 rotting packet?

2016-02-19 Thread Mattias Barthel
t; > To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > Subject: [E1000-devel] e1000 i82573 rotting packet? > > > > Hello, > > > > Im investigating a possible race between FW and SW ISR. > > > > Model: > > e1000: chipset i82573 > > versions: >

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 i82573 rotting packet?

2016-02-19 Thread Mattias Barthel
ad, helps the issue quite a lot. > >> Cheers, >> John >> >> >> > -Original Message- >> > From: Mattias Barthel [mailto:mbart...@accedian.com] >> > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 11:24 AM >> > To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 i82573 rotting packet?

2016-02-19 Thread Ronciak, John
ccedian.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 11:24 AM > To: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [E1000-devel] e1000 i82573 rotting packet? > > Hello, > > Im investigating a possible race between FW and SW ISR. > > Model: > e1000: chipset i82573 > version

[E1000-devel] e1000 i82573 rotting packet?

2016-02-18 Thread Mattias Barthel
Hello, Im investigating a possible race between FW and SW ISR. Model: e1000: chipset i82573 versions: driver: e1000 version: 7.3.20-k2pt firmware-version: 0.5-7 I am seeing rx delays up to 4ms when receiving bursts of around 3-4-5 packets very tightly almost back-to-back. The time distance betw