> From: Tom Schindl
>
> I'm not a committer on the runtime project. It I be able to get commit
> rights there.
You are a committer already Tom. Runtime was merged into Platform UI.
John
___
e4-dev mailing list
e4-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.or
On 03.09.13 15:38, John Arthorne wrote:
> I agree leaving it in e4 repository is not the right long term home. You
> interpreted the silence to Dirk's post to mean that nobody wants it.
> Another way to interpret that is nobody objected so you can go ahead and
> release it in a core runtime bundle.
es at runtime so I would be curious
>> to hear their input on that. Have you guys talked to them about your
>> approach?
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From:Tom Schindl
>> To:e4-dev@eclipse.org,
>> Date:
curious to hear their input on that. Have you guys talked to them about
>> your approach?
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From:Tom Schindl
>> To:e4-dev@eclipse.org,
>> Date:09/03/2013 09:07 AM
>> Subject:Re:
ur approach?
>
> John
>
>
>
>
> From:Tom Schindl
> To: e4-dev@eclipse.org,
> Date:09/03/2013 09:07 AM
> Subject:Re: [e4-dev] Eclipse Internationalization with the new
> message extension and the Eclipse translation pattern
> Sent
From:
Wim Jongman
To:
E4 Project developer mailing list ,
Date:
09/04/2013 11:26 AM
Subject:
Re: [e4-dev] Eclipse Internationalization with the new message extension
and the Eclipse translation pattern
Sent by:
e4-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
+1
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Lars Vogel wrote
so I would be
>> curious to hear their input on that. Have you guys talked to them about
>> your approach?
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From:Tom Schindl
>> To:e4-dev@eclipse.org,
>> Date:09/03/2013 09:07 AM
>
To: e4-dev@eclipse.org,
> Date:09/03/2013 09:07 AM
> Subject:Re: [e4-dev] Eclipse Internationalization with the new
> message extension and the Eclipse translation pattern
> Sent by:e4-dev-boun...@eclipse.org
> --
>
&
d at this. They
are the experts in supporting multiple locales at runtime so I would be
curious to hear their input on that. Have you guys talked to them about
your approach?
John
From: Tom Schindl
To: e4-dev@eclipse.org,
Date: 09/03/2013 09:07 AM
Subject:Re: [e4-dev] Eclips
Hi Tom,
AFAIK the e4 project is for hosting innovative new technologies like this
new translation approach which I really like.
I agree that the bundle name should get changed. Maybe this project should
also be moved to its own e4 Git repo to separate it from the tools but IMHO
e4 is the right pl
Hi,
The problem is that currently this whole stuff is the tools-namespace
and I think it is not very logical that something like this in tools
whereas it clearly is a runtime kind of thing.
The same argument goes for the IResource stuff beside that the you'll
notice that there are also the bridge
Hi,
If I understand your email correctly you are suggesting to move the current
implementation to another Git repo. What is the problem with leaving it in
the e4 tools repository? You have commit rights there and if Dirk want to
work on it, we can also suggest him as e4 committer.
Best regards,
Hi,
>From the lack of feedback it seems the platform is not really interested
in this feature.
Still we - e(fx)clipse - would like to advertise this way of NLS to our
(e4) users. I talked to Dirk and he's no objections moving it to
efxclipse-runtime where our core bundles only depend on e4-di (no
your blog, the migration is easy
enough.
Keep up the great work!
Smile
Christoph
Von: e4-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto:e4-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] Im Auftrag
von Dirk Fauth
Gesendet: Montag, 12. August 2013 11:21
An: e4-dev@eclipse.org
Betreff: [e4-dev] Eclipse Internationalization with the new me
Hi everybody,
I'm not sure if everybody is aware of the message extenstion that was
created by Tom Schindl and extended by me.
I would say it is an evolution of the existing internationalization stuff
in Eclipse, that introduces a lot more flexibility.
Currently it is contributed to the e4.tools
15 matches
Mail list logo
