Hello,
I am using idea on MacOs X, but I have a problem to access { character. Someone
knows how solve this problem ?
Didier Rano
Serv'N Data
___
Eap-features mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
+1 to an Alphabetical sorting option
+1 to an MRU sorting option
+1 to a drag-(or click)-to-rearrange tabs ability
+1 to a don't-ever-have-more-than-one-row-of-tabs option! (just make
the tabs skinnier and truncate filenames.)
+1 to a place tabs on left or right side of window option (like, eh
+1
Should sort maybe from Left to Right in order of last usage or something, so
the last used ones are easily accessible.
Travis
"Adam Goldband" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
ae405e$vam$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:ae405e$vam$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> +1
>
> "Mark Chandler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
Not that I know of. Last I heard, the Aspect people were working on
finishing up the Eclipse integration. The Aspect people were interested
in doing an Intellij integration, prob contingent on the OpenAPI.
Apparently, Intellij users are pretty vocal. ;o)
--pete
Aiko Mastboom wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
+1
"Mark Chandler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> It would be great if the file tabs would or could be sorted. I find I
> have to constantly scan the list of file tabs looking for the file I
> wish to edit.
>
> -markc
>
> --
> Mark Chandler
> [
Myself and several people I work with have expressed a desire to be able to
undock the windows...
That would then give us the ability to resize them and be able to see as
many as your screen will allow...
Given the undockability of other kinds of windows, would this be a hard
feature to add?
tha
Ok yeah cool that's a little better. I'm fine with horizontal split. Better
than nothing. I agree the biggest benefit would be to have different files in
each editor.
I'm sure many have seen the splitting abilities of http://www.jedit.org I
think they've got the best splitting
you can do a horizontal split of the editor (not side by side, but top & bottom). If
you
have 629, look at the very top of the editor panel where you should see a splitter with
three arrows (down, centre & up). Requests have been made to have vertical split, and
the ability to have different fi
Sorry, I didn't communicate well. If the highlight bar is on the 1st
class in the list, then an up arrow should cycle the highlight bar to
the last class in the list. Also, if none of the classes are
highlighted, then an up arrow should place the highlight bar on the last
class in the list. Th
Is it possible to split the editors. Seems like a very basic editor feature,
so you can look at the same source in two different places or two files side by
side. Is this possible with IDEA? I can't seem to find out how to do it.
thanks
-kevin
It would be great if the file tabs would or could be sorted. I find I
have to constantly scan the list of file tabs looking for the file I
wish to edit.
-markc
--
Mark Chandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ASIX Inc.
10900 NE 8th Street, Suite 700
Bellevue, WA 98004-4447
425-635-0709
www.asix.com
___
I love the incremental search feature (loved it in EMACS, too). What I miss
from EMACS is where as soon as I typed a character that caused the
incremental search to fail, it would beep. In IDEA, I have to look all the
way at the top and then notice that the text has turned red, indicating a
sear
+1
I only work on a single package, not on all 400 packages in the huge
project. I'd like to be able to filter the TODO list to only specific
packages, or even the specific file. I'd like to see a button on the screen
that lets me control the scope (project / package / class). That would be
co
Neil Galarneau wrote:
> It would be very helpful to have a new Line Separator type: File Dependent. This
>type
> would look inside the file and use the Line Separator type that was already there.
>
> When you have access to both a unix file system & a windows file system at the same
>time,
> t
For a while now I have been wanting this feature: Find all classes that
this class depends on.
My reason is that my company runs a process that recompiles the entire tree
and runs all test cases every time someone checks something into cvs. If I
have missed committing some change to some class
Is there a way that I can just get the TODOs of the current class, or
its package, instead of having all TODOs from all sources? With so many
TODOs it makes it difficult to find the relevant ones for the module you
are currently writing.
Pete
___
Ea
+1
Nathan Brown wrote:
> +1
> Paul Bradshaw wrote:
>
>>I've asked for this before... an "Implement Interface" selection when
>>right clicking an interface in the project view. It would
>>automatically create a new class (with the proper "extends" class
>>written in) and immediately jump you in
Alex Dommasch wrote:
> A way I do it is:
> * type "new TicketServer()",
> * Alt-Enter [create the class by intention]
> * Ctrl-Alt-Left [go back to use point]
> * Ctrl-Alt-V [introduce variable from expression]
I use that way most of the time, but sometimes, I revert to writing the
A way I do it is:
* type "new TicketServer()",
* Alt-Enter [create the class by intention]
* Ctrl-Alt-Left [go back to use point]
* Ctrl-Alt-V [introduce variable from expression]
The nice thing about IntroduceVariable and other refactorings is that
they automatically select the current line if
It would be very helpful to have a new Line Separator type: File Dependent. This type
would look inside the file and use the Line Separator type that was already there.
When you have access to both a unix file system & a windows file system at the same
time,
there doesn't appear to be any setti
I mean to create PersistenceCapable classes with an enhancer. This should
be invisible to the programmer so it would be nice to say, "Compile and
Enhance" or something like that.
And in response to Mike's comment, the ant task works obviously, but having
to setup a new ant task for each class an
I don't see this behaviour. The keyboard focus is always in the textbox no
matter what you do with the arrow keys.
"Jon Steelman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> For Ctrl+N, I have found myself wanting this refinement:
> If an up arrow is typed
Hi,
Just wondering if there is any news from the AspectJ front...
I've been reading the articles on JavaWorld, the Programing Guide.
It appears to be quite promissing and I can't wait to start with it.
If only my favorite IDE would have support for it...
Aiko
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld
+1
Paul Bradshaw wrote:
> I've asked for this before... an "Implement Interface" selection when
> right clicking an interface in the project view. It would
> automatically create a new class (with the proper "extends" class
> written in) and immediately jump you into the Ctrl-I dialog for
> selec
As far as I could see, the only external dependency in the API at this
moment is on org.jdom.Element. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Wouldn't it make sense to change the API to use org.w3c.dom.Element
instead? This would remove the dependency on third party libraries
altogether since J2SE 1.4
When I've used it, I find that I've frequently made a local variable already
to hold the new parameter. It would be nice if I could promote a local
variable to be a parameter. Now I have to make a new parameter from the
initialization statement of the local, inline the local and then rename the
+1
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bradshaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 12:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Eap-features] Re: Create concrete class from
interface/abstract
I've asked for this before... an "Implement Interface" selection when
right
clicking
I've asked for this before... an "Implement Interface" selection when right
clicking an interface in the project view. It would automatically create a
new class (with the proper "extends" class written in) and immediately jump
you into the Ctrl-I dialog for selecting the methods to implement.
Su
Hendrik,
I think that org.jdom.Element with all references from it gives enough
troubles.
--
Best regards,
Mike Aizatsky.
--
JetBrains, Inc / IntelliJ Software
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
___
Eap-featu
For Ctrl+N, I have found myself wanting this refinement:
If an up arrow is typed when focus is in the textbox, focus moves to the
end of the match list. As it should, a down arrow typed when at the
bottom of the list move focus back to the textbox.
Thanks,
Jon
_
The extract interface refractor is great but I would like a reverse of this,
i.e. being able to select an interface and say create class.
Thanks,
Josh
___
Eap-features mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-fea
+1
"Alexander Evsukov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Paul Ruane wrote:
>
> +1
>
> S.
>
> > Would it be possible to have a switch to choose how code folding works,
or else I propose this as a replacement to the current code folding method.
> >
Mike,
Does the open API expose many third party types?
If there are only few, you could try exposing adapters, which are loaded by
a common classloader, instead of the real interfaces/classes. But this
becomes a hassle once you have more than a few.
Please take a look at
http://jakarta.apache.o
Hendrik,
> In our product we used an older (incompatible) version of JDom
As I said earlier it's not possible to separate JDom IDEA uses from plugin.
Just because of the fact IDEA API defines parameters of such a type. Or am I
not aware of some useful classloader technique?
--
Best regards,
Mik
My vote is for each plugin having a separate CL.
Now that idea runs customer plugins, it must be thought of having
potentially the same issues as any application servers!
There can be versioning clashes between the plugins' and idea libraries'
but also clashes are possible among different plug
Mike,
it's a maintainability issue. In our product we used an older (incompatible)
version of JDom. In order to make our plugin work for IDEA, we are forced to
upgrade and therefore forced to use the JDom version IDEA uses. JDom is
currently beta (OK - a pretty stable beta), so the probability is
Hendrik,
Which classes from IDEA lead to conflict? Is it really a pain?
In fact, the separate plugin classloader might be created. But with the
following consideration: all plugins should access IDEA classes. So,
idea.jar will be in that classloader. Since JDOM classes are used in IDEA
API it wi
"Mike Aizatsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
ae1rho$21l$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:ae1rho$21l$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >IMHO it would be better to highlight invalid attribute types in DTD as
> errors.
>
> What do you mean? Isn't IDEA highlighting them now?
I wrote:
IDEA doesn't find anything
Hi,
we are currently developing a plugin for out favourite IDE and discovered
that plugins are not executed with their own classloader. I.e. they can see
classes loaded by the main application. If those classes were only intellij
classes that would not be a problem. But also visible to plugins ar
It's possible already. Please check the case checking options in IDE |
CodeCompletion.
Eugene
"Johannes Schneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
>
> if you open the code complition and continue typing the methodname, idea
> "optimizes"
What does you mean for JDO support?
Autogeneration mapping's files? Or authogeneration simple beans? :)
I work with JDO and intelliJ and does not needed for more JDO support.
What your idea is?
"Travis Reeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
ae1f0e$nl7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:ae1f0e$nl7$[EM
Vladimir,
>IMHO it would be better to highlight invalid attribute types in DTD as
errors.
What do you mean? Isn't IDEA highlighting them now?
> Other checks, such as uniqueness of attribute with "ID" type, would be
good too.
Can you give an example of what would you like to check?
--
Best re
Hi,
if you open the code complition and continue typing the methodname, idea
"optimizes" the methods, that can be choosen.
That´s really nice feature, but could be better.
If I type the wrong case, IDEA still finds the right method, but it would
be nice, if IDEA corrects the case automatically
IMHO it would be better to highlight invalid attribute types in DTD as
errors.
Other checks, such as uniqueness of attribute with "ID" type, would be good
too.
Thanks.
___
Eap-features mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/
Hi,
Why don't you use the ant task after compilation?
--
Best regards,
Mike Aizatsky.
--
JetBrains, Inc / IntelliJ Software
http://www.intellij.com
"Develop with pleasure!"
___
Eap-features mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's definetely a good idea :o)
Guillaume
> Any plans for this? Like to enhance classes for JDO to make them
> PersistenceCapable..
___
Eap-features mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.jetbrains.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
Yes, indeed. Javadoc comments should be foldable with the things they
describe.
"Paul Ruane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> Would it be possible to have a switch to choose how code folding works, or
else I propose this as a replacement to the current code fold
47 matches
Mail list logo
