Re: [easybuild] Supporting WRF 3.8

2016-04-26 Thread Andreas Hilboll
Hi Kenneth, Kenneth Hoste writes: > Hi Andreas, > > On 20/04/16 20:44, Andreas Hilboll wrote: >> Okay, it seems I have the regexp now. Now I need to fiddle with the >> patches ... but that should be okay. I'll submit a PR once I'm done. > > Any luck? I guess so. I still have trouble getting

Re: [easybuild] Supporting WRF 3.8

2016-04-20 Thread Kenneth Hoste
On 20/04/16 20:44, Andreas Hilboll wrote: How would the decision which easyblock version to use be done properly? I'd somehow have to add support for WRF >= 3.8 without taking away support for earlier versions. Would that go via subclassing the EB_WRF class? If so, how would I ensure that

Re: [easybuild] Supporting WRF 3.8

2016-04-20 Thread Andreas Hilboll
>> How would the decision which easyblock version to use be done properly? >> I'd somehow have to add support for WRF >= 3.8 without taking away >> support for earlier versions. Would that go via subclassing the EB_WRF >> class? If so, how would I ensure that EasyBuild automatically picks the >>

Re: [easybuild] Supporting WRF 3.8

2016-04-20 Thread Kenneth Hoste
On 20/04/16 19:41, Andreas Hilboll wrote: Hi Kenneth, Kenneth Hoste writes: Someone warned me about this change, but I haven't had time to look at this yet (and I haven't had a pressing need to bump the WRF version yet either). However, it's probably not as bad as it sounds... run_cmd_qa

Re: [easybuild] Supporting WRF 3.8

2016-04-20 Thread Kenneth Hoste
Hi Andreas, On 20/04/16 19:18, Andreas Hilboll wrote: Hi EasyBuilders, I'm trying to translate the existing WRF easyconfig to the new version WRF 3.8. It seems the developers tried hard to make life hard for EasyBuild, as the "menu" for selecting the compiler is now not a simple list any