Hi Kenneth,
Kenneth Hoste writes:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On 20/04/16 20:44, Andreas Hilboll wrote:
>> Okay, it seems I have the regexp now. Now I need to fiddle with the
>> patches ... but that should be okay. I'll submit a PR once I'm done.
>
> Any luck?
I guess so. I still have trouble getting
On 20/04/16 20:44, Andreas Hilboll wrote:
How would the decision which easyblock version to use be done properly?
I'd somehow have to add support for WRF >= 3.8 without taking away
support for earlier versions. Would that go via subclassing the EB_WRF
class? If so, how would I ensure that
>> How would the decision which easyblock version to use be done properly?
>> I'd somehow have to add support for WRF >= 3.8 without taking away
>> support for earlier versions. Would that go via subclassing the EB_WRF
>> class? If so, how would I ensure that EasyBuild automatically picks the
>>
On 20/04/16 19:41, Andreas Hilboll wrote:
Hi Kenneth,
Kenneth Hoste writes:
Someone warned me about this change, but I haven't had time to look at
this yet (and I haven't had a pressing need to bump the WRF version yet
either).
However, it's probably not as bad as it sounds...
run_cmd_qa
Hi Andreas,
On 20/04/16 19:18, Andreas Hilboll wrote:
Hi EasyBuilders,
I'm trying to translate the existing WRF easyconfig to the new version
WRF 3.8. It seems the developers tried hard to make life hard for
EasyBuild, as the "menu" for selecting the compiler is now not a simple
list any
5 matches
Mail list logo