Re: [Ecls-list] Status ECL + Maxima

2010-08-22 Thread Robert Dodier
On 8/22/10, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: > Ok, I made a tiny fix to the function that decides whether variables may be > changed or not, and now ECL/CVS passes all tests except for one Thanks. Now with CVS head ECL + CVS head Maxima, I get no unexpected errors in the Maxima test suite (platfor

Re: [Ecls-list] Signaling a more specific condition on signals.

2010-08-22 Thread Pascal J. Bourguignon
Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll writes: > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Pascal J. Bourguignon > wrote: > > When a unix signal is received, ecl cl:signals a simple-error with: > > unixint.d:370:                FEerror("Serious signal ~D caught.", 1, > signal_code); > > In this i

Re: [Ecls-list] Status ECL + Maxima

2010-08-22 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Robert Dodier wrote: > I see those errors in rtest16 (and no others). > I am working w/ Maxima and ECL from their respective > CVS repos as of today, on Linux (Centos 4). > If I'm not mistaken, those are recent in origin. > I looked into it a few months ago; I con