Re: [Ecls-list] minor fixes for cross compilation

2010-09-22 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Anton Vodonosov wrote: > 2.a) Add CL_INT_BITS and CL_LONG_BITS declaration (similar to CL_FIXNUM_BITS) > 2.b) The declaration ECL_LONG_LONG_BITS=no geneted by default doesn't work > (the >     relevant build error log is attached). Probably it was meant to have _

Re: [Ecls-list] ecl is linking unnecessarily to libintl.so (at least on OpenSolaris)

2010-09-22 Thread Daniel Herring
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Daniel Herring wrote: On Sun, 19 Sep 2010, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: If the test passes without -lintl, then that library is not used.  If it only passes with -lintl, then you don't care what OS you're on unti

Re: [Ecls-list] minor fixes for cross compilation

2010-09-22 Thread Anton Vodonosov
And one more minor note. When you start (cross compiling) configure first time, information message says: .. ### 1) Vital information cannot be determined at configuration time ### because we are not able to run test programs. A file called ### ### has been created, that you will hav

[Ecls-list] minor fixes for cross compilation

2010-09-22 Thread Anton Vodonosov
Hello. I just successfully cross-compiled ECL head (git revision 09ae1f43c0cf244cdba5c9690e301c8a1aab2458) for ARM (arm9tdmi, linux). Minor fixes were required. 1. chmod + ecl_min and dpp in the installation of "build" ecl, in the directory {prefix}/lib/ecl-10.7.1/ 2. Fixes in the generated

Re: [Ecls-list] where to download ecl 10.7.1 release

2010-09-22 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
Sorry this is a problem with the automated webpage construction. I have bumped up the release number but have not actually produced any so far. 10.4.1 should be ok. Juanjo On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Anton Vodonosov wrote: > Hello, > > ECL project page says the last release is 10.7.1, but I