On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 7:50 AM, KDr2 wrote:
> onfiguration with the CFLAGS=-g makes ecl crash when using gcc-4.6.
Thanks for pointing that. It might indeed be the same problem I saw with
mingw32 + gcc 4.6 I will check it out when I have time
Juanjo
--
Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
c
As I said, ECL is not thought to be ran *from the build directory*. Some
time ago we introduced a patch that sets the include directory and adds the
local one -- this was needed for OpenAxiom. This broke compilation of code
when you are placed in ECL's build directory. I just cannot remove that
wi
It seems configuration with the CFLAGS=-g makes ecl crash when using
gcc-4.6.
WIth the configuration:
> buildir=build/dev CC=gcc-mp-4.6 CFLAGS=-g ./configure --enable-threads
> --with-x
I got a bad ecl:
;;; ECL C Backtrace
;;; 0 libecl.12.2.dylib 0x00010acafcd6
> si_d
I know how to make out this error:
I config ecl as below:
buildir=build/dev CC=gcc-mp-4.6 ./configure --prefix=/opt/ecl
> --enable-threads --with-x
then
cd build/dev
> make
> make install
then in the build dir (build/dev), I run /opt/ecl/bin/ecl, the error will
occur
> $ /opt/ecl/bin/ecl
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Daniel Herring wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Feb 2012, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
>
>> I just noticed that some cleverly optimizing compilers broke the code I used
>> to detect whether the stack grows upwards or downwards. I will upload a
>> patch tonight.
>
> Wouldn't t
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
> I just noticed that some cleverly optimizing compilers broke the code I used
> to detect whether the stack grows upwards or downwards. I will upload a patch
> tonight.
Wouldn't two calls to alloca() in a single function give a reliable answer
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Matthew Mondor wrote:
> So I again tested my simplified mutex.d implementation and
> interestingly, stability improved this time. So what I did is to merge
> it along with the Windows support, which still uses the old
> holder/counter dance. The new POSIX impleme
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 05:43:10 -0500
Matthew Mondor wrote:
> > I here attach the diff for review, testing and comments.
>
> Revised diff attached, the error reporting was done with arguments
> reversed, and there was a redundant pthread.h include.
Well, here again another revision, as I wasn't sat
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 05:10:47 -0500
Matthew Mondor wrote:
> I here attach the diff for review, testing and comments.
Revised diff attached, the error reporting was done with arguments
reversed, and there was a redundant pthread.h include.
--
Matt
diff --git a/src/c/threads/mutex.d b/src/c/threads
Hello,
Some time ago, when I had important stability issues with ECL and an
HTTPd I wrote for it, I worked out a reimplementation of POSIX mutexes
for ECL. However, most of my issues were actually related to boehm-gc,
so although I had posted the new implementation on this list back then,
I didn'
10 matches
Mail list logo
