Re: [Ecls-list] Project status and changes (please read)

Hi On 10 October 2013 23:51, Matthew Mondor wrote: > On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:54:01 +0200 > Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: > [...] > > * I am not going to change ECL's license. LGPL3's restrictions on web > > applications seem stupid to me and, as experience has shown, making such > a > > move w

[Ecls-list] UFFI returning double is broken?

Finally, i've figured out what was wrong. UFFI just generates C wrappers without an actual C function declaration, and by default ECL uses -w gcc option ignoring c:*suppress-compiler-warnings*. So this results in silently using a default return int type for foreign functions. As a workaround al

Re: [Ecls-list] Project status and changes (please read)

Juan Jose, how about publishing the changes already in git as the last release?So that future users use and discuss a version as close to git repository as possible.  07.10.2013, 12:55, "Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll" :Hi everybody, as you may have noticed, my level of responsiveness in the last months h

[Ecls-list] Small typo patch

Juanjo, I'm sorry to hear about your time constraints. Perhaps you could take one extremely small patch to fix a typo? I just happened to notice this in the compile output. diff --git a/src/clos/conditions.lsp b/src/clos/conditions.lsp index 88a0e9c..475f999 100644 --- a/src/clos/conditions.lsp