Re: [Ecls-list] Better handling of swank refedinition of method?

2012-12-27 Thread Pascal J. Bourguignon
Peter Enerccio writes: > When I try to use ecl with emacs and slime, if I need to change the > method to a different one, with different lambda list, I get an error > out of which I can't recover in any sensible way, so I have to stop > the ecl and start is again and load the new method in. This

Re: [Ecls-list] Better handling of swank refedinition of method?

2012-12-27 Thread Peter Enerccio
Thanks, I will use that. And I mean that there is nothing else (except that fmakeunbound that I learned now) to actually get program working again, other than turning off ecl and turn it on again (and get all the stuff back). 2012/12/27 Anton Vodonosov > 28.12.2012, 00:17, "Peter Enerccio" : >

Re: [Ecls-list] Better handling of swank refedinition of method?

2012-12-27 Thread Anton Vodonosov
28.12.2012, 00:17, "Peter Enerccio" : > When I try to use ecl with emacs and slime, if I need to change the method to > a different one, with different lambda list, I get an error out of which I > can't recover in any sensible way, so I have to stop the ecl and start is > again and load the new

[Ecls-list] Better handling of swank refedinition of method?

2012-12-27 Thread Peter Enerccio
When I try to use ecl with emacs and slime, if I need to change the method to a different one, with different lambda list, I get an error out of which I can't recover in any sensible way, so I have to stop the ecl and start is again and load the new method in. This is way too cumberstone, there sho