On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Pascal Costanza wrote:
> Many of the metaobject classes expose slots with names that are exported
> from some package or visible in CL-USER. This shouldn't be the case. (See
> "Restrictions on Implementations" in the MOP specification.)
Added a ticket to keep tra
On 3 Dec 2012, at 00:54, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
wrote:
> 6) Many of the metaobject classes expose slots with names that are exported
> from some package or visible in CL-USER. This shouldn't be the case. (See
> "Restrictions on Implementations" in the MOP specification.)
>
> I will fix this
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Pascal Costanza wrote:
> OK, I can report a success: All my test cases run through now (almost, see
> below ;).
>
Thanks once more for all your work on these issues. I really appreciate the
effort that it implies.
> 1) extract-specializer-names is not correct fo
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Pascal Costanza wrote:
> Here is a test case:
>
Thanks. The problem seems to be that make-method-lambda and defmethod live
in the same file and the function call was done through a pointer, not
through the symbol. I will upload a fix.
Juanjo
--
Instituto de Fí
On 2 Dec 2012, at 22:48, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Pascal Costanza wrote:
> 4) DEFMETHOD doesn't call MAKE-METHOD-LAMBDA to determine the method function
> body. [My guess is that this is not easy to change due to the deviation from
> the MOP specificat
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Pascal Costanza wrote:
> 4) DEFMETHOD doesn't call MAKE-METHOD-LAMBDA to determine the method
> function body. [My guess is that this is not easy to change due to the
> deviation from the MOP specification in how method functions are called.]
>
I will look into th
Hi,
OK, I can report a success: All my test cases run through now (almost, see
below ;).
However, there are still some remaining bugs:
1) extract-specializer-names is not correct for eql specializers. Consider:
(extract-specializer-names '((s (eql 's => ((EQL S)). However, the result
shou
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Pascal Costanza wrote:
> I don't think the HyperSpec allows for that interpretation. The entry for
> slot-value is specific that slot-unbound is called when a slot is unbound,
> and the entry for slot-unbound specifies that the default method signals an
> error of
Hi,
On 25 Nov 2012, at 23:58, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Pascal Costanza wrote:
> Next error: slot-unbound errors should not be optimized away as far as I can
> tell. Or is there anything in specifications (CL or MOP) that allows
> implementors to do th
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Pascal Costanza wrote:
> Next error: slot-unbound errors should not be optimized away as far as I
> can tell. Or is there anything in specifications (CL or MOP) that allows
> implementors to do that?
>
There are various things conflicting here:
1* There was a ty
Next error: slot-unbound errors should not be optimized away as far as I can
tell. Or is there anything in specifications (CL or MOP) that allows
implementors to do that?
Here is a test case:
(defun test ()
(declare (optimize (speed 3) (space 0) (compilation-speed 0)))
(handler-case (clos:g
Hi Juanja,
On 19 Nov 2012, at 10:36, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Pascal Costanza wrote:
> I'm back in the land of the living… ;)
>
> Thanks for getting back to this!
>
> - Previously, ECL had a way of specifying :optimize-slot-access for classes
> to
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Pascal Costanza wrote:
> - It seems that slot-unbound is not correctly handled. Here is a test case:
>
Thanks for reporting this, Pascal. I just fixed it.
Is the other issue about slot optimization a problem? Note that I would
rather have _no_ code in closer-mo
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Pascal Costanza wrote:
> I'm back in the land of the living… ;)
>
Thanks for getting back to this!
> - Previously, ECL had a way of specifying :optimize-slot-access for
> classes to state whether slot access should go through the CLOS MOP slot
> access functio
Hi,
I'm back in the land of the living… ;)
And I have two bugs to report:
- Previously, ECL had a way of specifying :optimize-slot-access for classes to
state whether slot access should go through the CLOS MOP slot access functions
or should be optimized. Judging from the source code for ECL,
Hi,
I am currently in the middle of a move, so I don't have time to work on this
right now. I will be able to continue working on this from the end of the month
on…
Best,
Pascal
On 12 Oct 2012, at 12:53, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
wrote:
> I have uploaded a set of changes that turn the last se
16 matches
Mail list logo
