Re: [Ecls-list] Problem with compiled asdf.

2010-06-30 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Matthew Mondor wrote: > I could finally test the diff, it turned out that the changes were > indeed incomplete. > Here is attached the revised diff. > Thanks a lot for the fix. I will send it to the ASDF mailing list. Juanjo -- Instituto de Física Fundamental,

Re: [Ecls-list] Problem with compiled asdf.

2010-06-29 Thread Matthew Mondor
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:36:46 -0400 Matthew Mondor wrote: > Perhaps that the attached diff could help (untested however, I have to > leave in a few minutes and can only test it tomorrow). I could finally test the diff, it turned out that the changes were indeed incomplete. Here is attached the re

Re: [Ecls-list] Problem with compiled asdf.

2010-06-29 Thread Pascal J. Bourguignon
p...@informatimago.com (Pascal J. Bourguignon) writes: > Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll writes: > >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Pascal J. Bourguignon >> wrote: >> >> (require :asdf) >>    (load (merge-pathnames >>            (make-pathname :name "ASDF" :type "LISP" >>            

Re: [Ecls-list] Problem with compiled asdf.

2010-06-29 Thread Pascal J. Bourguignon
Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll writes: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Pascal J. Bourguignon > wrote: > > (require :asdf) >    (load (merge-pathnames >            (make-pathname :name "ASDF" :type "LISP" >                           :directory '(:relative "ECL-REQUIRES") >      

Re: [Ecls-list] Problem with compiled asdf.

2010-06-29 Thread Matthew Mondor
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 15:53:22 -0400 Matthew Mondor wrote: > Are there many required POSIX syscalls? If there only are a handful, > perhaps ECL itself could provide those functions and export them in the > SI package for ASDF to use? This would allow the C inline parts to > build as part of ECL a

Re: [Ecls-list] Problem with compiled asdf.

2010-06-29 Thread Matthew Mondor
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:25:16 +0200 Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: > This code shows a problem. Some time ago ASDF developers decided that it was > essential to have some POSIX functions available. Unfortunately this means > that ASDF can not be loaded from sources because it uses calls to C-INLIN

Re: [Ecls-list] Problem with compiled asdf.

2010-06-29 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Pascal J. Bourguignon < p...@informatimago.com> wrote: > (require :asdf) >(load (merge-pathnames >(make-pathname :name "ASDF" :type "LISP" > :directory '(:relative "ECL-REQUIRES") > :case :common)

Re: [Ecls-list] Problem with compiled asdf.

2010-06-29 Thread Pascal J. Bourguignon
Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll writes: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Pascal J. Bourguignon > wrote: > > With ecl 10.4.2, for some ASDF systems, I get this error: > In function CAR, the value of the only argument is >  # > which is not of the expected type LIST > > There was a prob

Re: [Ecls-list] Problem with compiled asdf.

2010-06-28 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Pascal J. Bourguignon < p...@informatimago.com> wrote: > > With ecl 10.4.2, for some ASDF systems, I get this error: > In function CAR, the value of the only argument is > # > which is not of the expected type LIST > There was a problem with one function proclama

[Ecls-list] Problem with compiled asdf.

2010-06-27 Thread Pascal J. Bourguignon
With ecl 10.4.2, for some ASDF systems, I get this error: In function CAR, the value of the only argument is # which is not of the expected type LIST For example: >> (asdf:find-system :com.informatimago.clext) ; loading system definition from PACKAGES:COM;INFORMATIMAGO;CLEXT;SYSTEM.ASD int