Re: [Ecls-list] Slime build failure (Was: Project status)

2010-12-12 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Matthew Mondor wrote: > I could indeed see the ECL_BASE_STRING_P() check in enter_directory() > but had no idea how come that case wasn't problematic before or with > other software. > Maybe there was some normalization phase in older versions of ECL (somewhere co

Re: [Ecls-list] Slime build failure (Was: Project status)

2010-12-12 Thread Matthew Mondor
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010 20:09:13 +0100 Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: > I identified the problem and fixed it. Slime is building pathnames with > components of type (array character (*)) while the operating system (or at > least the ECL routines) only accept (array base-char (*)). I have added a > fi

Re: [Ecls-list] Slime build failure (Was: Project status)

2010-12-12 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Matthew Mondor wrote: > On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 14:55:21 -0500 > Matthew Mondor wrote: > > > I'll also try with an up to date slime when I have more time, but I > > wanted to post this in case the origin of the problem seems obvious to > > others. > > It also happens

Re: [Ecls-list] Slime build failure (Was: Project status)

2010-12-11 Thread Matthew Mondor
On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 14:55:21 -0500 Matthew Mondor wrote: > I'll also try with an up to date slime when I have more time, but I > wanted to post this in case the origin of the problem seems obvious to > others. It also happens with today's SLIME CVS HEAD and an empty ~/.eclrc -- Matt --

Re: [Ecls-list] Slime build failure (Was: Project status)

2010-12-11 Thread Matthew Mondor
I didn't take time to try with a more recent version of slime yet, although I've used that tree for a while successfully with various previous ECL builds. This is using today's ECL CVS HEAD. What I get is the following: [...] ;;; Note: ;;; Invoking external command: ;;; gcc -I. "-I/usr/local