Re: [Ecls-list] Standalone binary not really standalone?

2013-06-05 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Peter Enerccio wrote: > Cant asdf be prepackaged into fas? Which is something I wanted to report > too, when loading such fas built out of asdf package (cl-opengl), it > requires cmp package, thus I think will not work on system without compiler. My God, it seems

Re: [Ecls-list] Standalone binary not really standalone?

2013-06-04 Thread Peter Enerccio
Cant asdf be prepackaged into fas? Which is something I wanted to report too, when loading such fas built out of asdf package (cl-opengl), it requires cmp package, thus I think will not work on system without compiler. 2013/6/5 Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll > > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:26 PM, William

Re: [Ecls-list] Standalone binary not really standalone?

2013-06-04 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:26 PM, William Hounslow < houns...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > The initial problem was something to do with an unexpected rubout > character in the FASL (I don't have a record of this unfortunately). I then > tried deleting the ASDF cache to force a total recompilation

Re: [Ecls-list] Standalone binary not really standalone?

2013-06-04 Thread William Hounslow
Hi again, On 29/05/2013 18:53, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:10 PM, William Hounslow > wrote: Can a truly standalone program be created? If not, how to ensure that the end user can deploy the output binary in a locatio

Re: [Ecls-list] Standalone binary not really standalone?

2013-05-29 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:10 PM, William Hounslow < houns...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Can a truly standalone program be created? If not, how to ensure that the > end user can deploy the output binary in a location of their choice? Apart from what you have been told, ECL can be built in st

Re: [Ecls-list] Standalone binary not really standalone?

2013-05-29 Thread Bruce-Robert Fenn Pocock
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:10 PM, William Hounslow < houns...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > I was hoping to use make-build to create a monolithic binary I could then just drop into the cgi-bin directory. It failed thus: > > error while loading shared libraries: libecl.so.13.4: cannot open share

[Ecls-list] Standalone binary not really standalone?

2013-05-29 Thread William Hounslow
I was hoping to use make-build to create a monolithic binary I could then just drop into the cgi-bin directory. It failed thus: error while loading shared libraries: libecl.so.13.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Can a truly standalone program be created? If not