-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1998 22:54:26 -0700
From: Buffalo Folks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Stop the Slaughter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: EMERGENCY ALERT: Horse Butte Buffalo Capture Facility Imminent
Greetings
We only have 'til Wednesday
The DOL is being very i
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 15:24:29 +
From: Nick Rau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CLIMATE-ONLINE: climate online - URGENT ACTION: Email Exxon today!
Dear Climate Online Campaigner
**Urgent Action**Urgent Action**Urgent Action**Urge
Date sent: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 12:02:29 -0600
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "Us" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:Re: Compassion to the animals!
Originally to:
good going. good luck.
>I understand how you can escape the patriarchal reality of Christianity
>with excuses like "God is omnipotent." The fact is that your language
>itself, your manner of speaking in terms of masculinity, domination,
>"sin", etc. is inherently contrary to both the goals
Us <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In saying "pets", you also mean such pets as dogs and cats?
> --
> > From: Washer Zine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: Compassion to the animals!
> > Date: Tuesday, November 17, 1998 1:59 P
Hey yall, this is just a little FYI about the Gap's (incl the Gap,
Banana Republic, and Old Navy) involvement w. old growth cutting. (and a
national day of protest, if you're up to it). ~gwendolyn
Dear Friends!
Please join us for Gap Picket Day, on November 27, the day after
Thanksgiving, whic
I have to disagree with this statement in a way because although I agree
that many pets are abused and mistreated, I also think that many pets are
also loved and treated very well. What would be a "natural habitat" for a
dog or a cat? I do agree that confining wild animals is wrong, unless they
ar
I understand how you can escape the patriarchal reality of Christianity
with excuses like "God is omnipotent." The fact is that your language
itself, your manner of speaking in terms of masculinity, domination,
"sin", etc. is inherently contrary to both the goals and the methodology
of ecofemism.
i fully agree.
sarah clifton wrote:
> I just subscribed to this mailing list as because I wanted a
> forum to interact with other ecofeminists. Everything I have read since
> I subscribed has been a bandy of Christianity.
>
> My question is this: Why is there a fanatical Christ
In a message dated 11/17/98 11:14:03 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< how
irresponsible is it to destroy an animals home because you want planks for
your yacht? >>
Hi folks, this is a good point, but could we take it a step further? How
irresponsible is it to destroy a
10 matches
Mail list logo
