NVIRONMENT
> Subject: Re: Society for Human Population Control : as a matter of
> discussion
>
> Wong Ee Ling,
>
> That's one hell of a question... I missed much in conversation on the
> list,
> but that was one hell of a question. Who is the president of ecofem?
&g
Wong Ee Ling,
That's one hell of a question... I missed much in conversation on the list,
but that was one hell of a question. Who is the president of ecofem?
You're so funny! I am so very grateful for your insight, intelligence, and
perspective when I have time to read what you've written. I hav
NMENT
> Subject: RE: Society for Human Population Control : as a matter of
> discussion
>
> Hi, everybody,
> It mystifies me to find something like this on a "feminist" list. Forget
> it!
> I find this post extremely offensive and misogynist. Just so you know why
to hear !
> --
> From: Viviane Lerner[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 1999 10:16 AM
> To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT
> Subject: RE: Society for Human Population Control : as a matt
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wong Ee Ling
> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 1999 2:57 PM
> To: STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT
> Subject: RE: Society for Human Population Control : as a matter of
> discussion
>
>
> Dear Vicki,
>
> You asked me why I said that it was a disil
Dear Vicki,
You asked me why I said that it was a disillusionment? Well, this was
what Russell mentioned :
> With respect, I ask this in the hope of stimulating discussion:
> Isn't it a fairly common thread of ecofeminism to feel that "the
> fundamental problem of the human race" is first wor
