.
Good luck,
David S
On 2018-09-10 21:07, David Schneider wrote:
Hello Jorge,
If you would like to look at an accessible text try:
Bayesian Methods for Ecology Paperback – May 10 2007
by Michael A. McCarthy
The Wikipedia entry has a number of errors, so not to be trusted.
Speaking of being
Hello Jorge,
If you would like to look at an accessible text try:
Bayesian Methods for Ecology Paperback – May 10 2007
by Michael A. McCarthy
The Wikipedia entry has a number of errors, so not to be trusted.
Speaking of being careful, there are no verifiable pictures of
Thomas Bayes. The
On 2017-08-08 12:19, Joanne I. Ellis wrote:
This is a quick request to please pass on the ads below, particularly
if you know of someone looking for a Postdoc or PhD opportunity in
marine sciences. Thank you all so much.
Joanne Ellis
We have two postdoctoral fellowships available within the
, even if not where I think
it deserves to be published. That's my view. Suum cuique.
Yours in the pursuit of evidence based results,
David Schneider
On 2017-05-19 13:41, Edwin Cruz-Rivera wrote:
Dear all,
I apologize for the cross listing. We are trying to cover as broad
a canvas as possible
if the prof with whom you worked knows about these guidelines.
Does the student who contacted you know there are guidelines?
Best of luck,
David Schneider
On 2017-02-23 17:04, Gabriel Chavez wrote:
Hello ECOLOGers,
My name is Gabriel and I had a question to pose concerning use of
authorship
Hi Howie Neufeld,
I'm going to suggest that rather than requiring a particular
course, such as calculus, that you identify a set of courses that
address
quantitative reasoning based on the logic of mathematics
as it applies to measured quantities.
This set might include calculus courses that
Hello all,
The ESA criteria are essentially the same as the
'Vancouover protocol' by the International
Council of Medical Journal Editors.
See
http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html
In the case at hand, if a
) or with inference from a prior to a posterior
probability, if that is what you want to do.
~ David Schneider
Quoting "Street, Garrett" <gms...@msstate.edu>:
> There is also an excellent section on what constitutes a random or fixed
> effect in Tom Hobbs and Mevin Hoo
Neil,
Thanks for posting two recent publications on speed of
review. My experience with the review process as an
author goes back to 1978 (Nature 271). My experience as
reviewer began 1988. For a decade I was responsible
for the review process at a leading journal in marine
science.
The PLOS
For a humorous application of inverse probability
(which somehow came to be called Bayesian statistics)
see
Stigler, S.M. 1983. Who discovered Bayes's Theorem?
The American Statistician 37:290-296
David Schneider
Quoting Gary Grossman gross...@uga.edu:
I'm looking for funny articles
Hey Allison,
Most of the grad students with me have been MSc students,
I encourage them to cast the net wide to find a
rewarding professional career. Often that means
a series of hires, each with some new set of skills
to learn. And I encourage them to think about
any institution, whether it
of the diversity or errors that reviewers spot, and
prevalence of errors in the refereed literature.
With kind regards,
David Schneider
Quoting Lui Marinelli lmarine...@selkirk.ca:
Hope this isn't out of orderyears ago, a teacher had us review some bad,
peer reviewed, published articles, to show us
Dear David,
Thanks for posting article with long list of anomalous ecosystem
change in the Gulf of Maine. The puffin in Maine is indeed a
canary, it is an introduced (and vigorously fostered) species
in Maine. Its normal range is Iceland (millions!) with a north
American outpost in Canada
Dear ecologers,
The question posed in the quote on fact-checking
from David Duffy is:
Who should undertake the cost of fact checking?
The quote gives 3 answers: warranty by the author, make the
data available, in-house by the publisher.
In my experience, as reviewer and in an editorial
Dear ecologers,
The question posed in the quote on fact-checking
from David Duffy is:
Who should undertake the cost of fact checking?
The quote gives 3 answers: warrant by the author, make the
data available, in-house by the publisher.
In my experience, as reviewer and in an editorial
we are completely unqualified to peer review, and
editors allow this to happen, and readers allow papers to go without
question, things will not work right. As long as we question
everything, it will.
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 3:33 PM, David Schneider david.schnei...@mun.ca
wrote:
Dear
Hello Jason,
The 21st century approach to percent and count data
is to write the model, not search for the 'right test.'
In my experience it is possible for 4th year undergrads
and 1st year grad students, with little stats experience,
to learn this approach.
Statistical analysis based on
.
There are many other GzLM texts.
Hope that helps,
David Schneider
Quoting Klawinski, Paul klawins...@william.jewell.edu:
Hi all,
I am trying to educate my colleagues about some things and would like to ask
you some questions as you are members of a talented and learned society.
I am aware
Pioneers in science only rarely make discoveries by extracting ideas from pure
mathematics. Most of the stereotypical photographs of scientists studying rows
of
equations on a blackboard are instructors explaining discoveries already made.
Real progress comes in the field writing notes, at the
Hello Ecolog,
Here are my thoughts, written 11 PM from Boulder, CO.
Grad school is indeed audacious, and not a default choice.
As someone who spent 3 years on the 'dark side' (academic
admin) I know that there are *huge* differences among labs.
Some labs are very happy and students move to
Paul Cherubini El dorado
You might be surprised.
David Schneider
http://www.mun.ca/osc/dschneider/bio.php
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Paul Cherubini mona...@saber.net wrote:
On Jul 2, 2012, at 1:45 PM, Corbin, Jeffrey D. wrote:
1) but I made the specific point at our counter-presentation
Here is an article that might be relevant to
the discussion.
http://www.americanscientist.org/issues/feature/2012/2/when-scientists-choose-motherhood
David Schneider
- Forwarded message from Robert Hamilton roberthamil...@alc.edu -
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 14:20:53 -0400
From
.'
(criterion tends to be well written proposal
with regard to science and cash contribution by industry).
Your program officer at NSF can relate what they know about
the degree to which citation rate determines grant outcome.
David Schneider
Memorial University, St. John's NL Canada
Hello all,
For advice on the use of the arcsin transform, I
recommend the following paper:
http://www.esajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1890/10-0340.1
The title itself is worth poking the link.
David Schneider
Quoting Jordan Marshall marsh...@ipfw.edu:
Brian
I use arcsin(square root(proportion
Hello all,
Excellent advice from Nicole Michel.
There is a learning curve for GzLM, but it
is well worth the effort.
David Schneider
http://www.mun.ca/biology/dschneider/b7932/
Quoting Michel, Nicole L nmic...@tulane.edu:
Hi Alan et al.,
Generalized Linear Mixed Models (not to be confused
chance
(at some stated level of uncertainty) as an explanation
for some observed result.
David Schneider
c/o Biology, Memorial University, St. John's NL
http://www.elsevierdirect.com/ISBN/9780126278651/Quantitative-Ecology
Quoting Manuel Spínola mspinol...@gmail.com:
Dear list members
26 matches
Mail list logo
