Advertising a program which costs $2700 as a "Research Assistantship"
strikes me as disingenuous. As I've said on this list before, I'm not
absolutely opposed to pay-to-participate programs being posted on ECOLOG, I
just think there needs to be more truth in advertising. The definition of
Erik, I don't see the word "retract" anywhere in Pyron's statement. (Nor
"withdraw," "repudiate," etc.)
Furthermore, I find it hard to square "the headlines inserted for the piece
for publication said ... that 'we should only worry about preserving
biodiversity when it helps us.' I did not write
Hello all:
What, exactly, makes this program posted on ECOLOG yesterday an internship?
I could substitute "short course" for "internship" and "student" for
"intern" throughout the document and it would still make sense. The
substitutions might actually improve it, since this program sounds in
