[ECOLOG-L] Ecological Laws They do not exist Re: [ECOLOG-L] Visualizing functional diversity

2012-10-02 Thread Wayne Tyson
Hello Ted and all: I have put it this way: Organisms do what they can when they can, where they can. Virtually no one has refuted it, and virtually no one has affirmed it. I even tried to rattle some cages by saying that it was a Law (or at least an axiom) of biology/ecology; still no

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Ecological Laws

2010-11-14 Thread David L. McNeely
I used to remind students of Davy Crockett's maxim, Be sure you're right, then go ahead. I would follow that with, in science we go with, Be 95% sure you're right, then go ahead. But then I'd remind them that a collective of 95% sure decisions adds up to dead certain. Whenever I was

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Ecological Laws

2010-11-08 Thread Caryn Self-Sullivan
Food for thought (hope it's not too simplified for this listserv): I was taught, and I teach my students, that biologists, ecologists included, DO NOT work within the realm of PROOFS (as mathematicians do). Rather we work within the realm of PROBABILITIES. I do not allow my students to

Re: [ECOLOG-L] Ecological Laws

2010-11-08 Thread Gary Grossman
The statement below is why we still have a general public that doesn't accept evolution as fact, or global climate change, or, that invasive species harm ecosystems. Certainly what the author says is technically correct, but in reality what is the difference between a probability of occurrence of