2012/11/5 Martin Meiss
> Howdie, Ecologers,
>
> As others have pointed out, based on their knowledge of ecology,
> using a single axis (good, fair, poor) to evaluate ecosystems is inherently
> flawed. I would extend this to say that it is inherently flawed for
> mathematical/pragmatic re
ould employ at lot of ecologists and other scientists . . .
WT
----- Original Message -----
From: "malcolm McCallum"
To:
Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2012 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Is there a Water Quality Index for lakes?
The outcomes of what Nolan refers to are published in t
The outcomes of what Nolan refers to are published in the ASTM
Standard Methods.
These will be under effluent testing, 48 hr, 24 hr, etc acute and
chronic tox assays
using daphnae, chironomids, etc. There are other effluent testing
protocols for testing impairment,
most are standard methods under
Took a course one time taught by John Cairns, Ph.D. of VA Tech at the U. of
Michigan. His entire push was to use macroinvertebrates, etc. as more important
tools of monitoring Water Quality in not only Streams, Rivers, but also Lakes.
So, find publications from him.
I'm sure in all of the indic
The closest thing you are going to get is the following:
Oligotrophic lake
eutrophic lake
hypereutrophic lake
There are a ton of "intermediate" states.
Also, categories like marl ponds, peat bogs, fens..
many to most of these are defined on the very things you question.
However, the idea of i
o.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 12:20 PM
> To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
> Subject: [ECOLOG-L] Is there a Water Quality Index for lakes?
>
> Does anyone know if someone has developed a single, integrated water
> quality index that combines the basic parameters (Temp, DO,
From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news
[ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU] On Behalf Of Kirsten Harma [kharm...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 12:20 PM
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: [ECOLOG-L] Is there a Water Quality Index for lakes?
Does anyone know
Its also really depend on the nature of you question. "good" "fair" or
"poor" for human consumption criteria (you can use EPA guidelines for
this propose) or "good" "fair" or "poor" for environmental assessments. It
takes years if not decades for lakes to respond to anthropogenic/natural
alteration
Kirsten Harma wrote:
> Does anyone know if someone has developed a single, integrated water
quality index that combines the basic parameters (Temp, DO, Conductivity, pH
and secchi depth). We're curious if
there is an easy way to categorize a lake as in "good" "fair" or "poor"
condition
Does anyone know if someone has developed a single, integrated water
quality index that combines the basic parameters (Temp, DO, Conductivity, pH
and secchi depth). We're curious if
there is an easy way to categorize a lake as in "good" "fair" or "poor"
condition based on such an index (along
10 matches
Mail list logo