Jacobson's retraction of his fifty year-old statements also shows how the
topic of evolution is often linked to the origin of life when they are in
fact two different discussions. It seems to be a creationist tactic to
position them as the same.
On 10/25/07, Malcolm McCallum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, but we should be careful not to remove origins from the realm of science.
Seriously, at what nanosecond after the first spark of life was ignited did
evolution begin? Personally, I choose not to separate the two, and can't
really think of a good reason why anyone should.
Mike
On Friday
FYI, from the Chronicle of Higher Education:
http://chronicle.com/news/article/3312/scientist-retracts-1955-errors-now-cited-as-evidence-by-creationists?commented=0#txpCommentInputForm
October 25, 2007
Scientist Retracts 1955 Errors Now Cited as Evidence by Creationists
Sometimes it can take a