On 06/27/2013 02:51 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Hi Jürgen,
>
>
> the variant with cyg_mutex_trylock is like busy waiting, and
> should be reverted. But I agree that the
> "while (!cyg_mutex_lock()) continue;"
> construct is somehow really bad style.
>
> I do not think that cyg_mutex_lock can ever r
Hi Jürgen,
the variant with cyg_mutex_trylock is like busy waiting, and
should be reverted. But I agree that the
"while (!cyg_mutex_lock()) continue;"
construct is somehow really bad style.
I do not think that cyg_mutex_lock can ever return false,
unless the spl_mutex is completely invalid.
If
