> On Aug 16, 2016, at 11:42 PM, Yosuke Katayama1 wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We have a USB vendor who has a different understanding on USB IF
> specification from the EDK2's understanding(implementation).
>
> This mismatch was causing a trouble on our products in the past. There is no
> issue with
Hello,
We have a USB vendor who has a different understanding on USB IF specification
from the EDK2's understanding(implementation).
This mismatch was causing a trouble on our products in the past. There is no
issue with our ongoing products as we applied a workaround to our BIOS code but
we w
Thanks, Feng! J
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 at 11:25 Tian, Feng wrote:
> DP support depends on the graphic card you are using. You need consult IHV
> rather than usJ
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Feng
>
>
>
> *From:* GN Keshava [mailto:keshava...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 16, 2016 12:37 PM
> *To:* Tian,
DP support depends on the graphic card you are using. You need consult IHV
rather than us☺
Thanks
Feng
From: GN Keshava [mailto:keshava...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 12:37 PM
To: Tian, Feng ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [edk2] USB 3.1 Support in UEFI
Hello Feng,
Thank y
Eugene,
> > I mean I didn't know whether the *un-configured* status you want
> > contain *no policy setting * or not. But it doesn't matter now, from
> > your statement here, I know you don't care the policy setting.
>
> Correct the static vs dhcp is irrelevant - it's the fact that the IP layer
Reviewed-by: Feng Tian
Thanks
Feng
-Original Message-
From: Ni, Ruiyu
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 4:41 PM
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Tian, Feng
Subject: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg: MTRR_PHYSMASK.Valid should be one bit instead of 8
bits
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreem
Compute the number of ticks to wait to measure TSC frequency.
Instead of (ACPI_TIMER_FREQUENCY / 1) = 357 and 357 * 1 = 357,
use 363 * 9861 = 3579543 Hz which is within 2 Hz of ACPI_TIMER_FREQUENCY.
363 counts is a calibration time of 101.4 uS.
The idea comes from Michael and Paolo.
C
Eugene,
> > Yeah. When I was drafting the UDP APP to test the new fix, I found the
> > same case you mentioned. We must issue another UDP Configure () to
> > clean the previous state once the Ip4Mode.IsConfigured is TRUE. So,
> > the above example is not accurate with my the current
> > implement
In other words, suppose a BSP is running in hyperthreaded ON mode and it has 2
threads per physical core. Can the BSP be either thread 0 or thread 1 ?Is this
documented somewhere ?
Thanks,
Shubha Shubha D. ramanishubharam...@gmail.com
shubharam...@yahoo.com
__
Jiaxin,
> Yeah. When I was drafting the UDP APP to test the new fix, I found the
> same case you mentioned. We must issue another UDP Configure () to
> clean the previous state once the Ip4Mode.IsConfigured is TRUE. So,
> the above example is not accurate with my the current
> implementation:(. B
Jiaxin,
> I mean I didn't know whether the *un-configured* status you want
> contain *no policy setting * or not. But it doesn't matter now, from
> your statement here, I know you don't care the policy setting.
Correct the static vs dhcp is irrelevant - it's the fact that the IP layer
comes up
> Hi Eugene,
>
> I think we need fully understand your usage before analyzing the
> problem. Could you please explain more details? You mentioned you
> only wanted to enable the network interface when directed by an
> application. If so, is it possible that you don't connect your network
> devic
Series reviewed-by: Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud
Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud
SESM - OS / SW Architect
Systems Management Development, Data Center Group
Lenovo United States
+1.919.908.5833
+1.512.659.1523
smahm...@lenovo.com
Lenovo.com /us
Twitter | Facebook | Instagram | Blogs | Forums
-Origin
Andrew:
I got your point. Yes. The precedence rules can be updated to reflect their
order.
Thanks
Liming
From: af...@apple.com [mailto:af...@apple.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 12:28 AM
To: Gao, Liming
Cc: Kurt Kennett ; edk2-devel
Subject: Re: [edk2] Setting BuildOptions by module t
Andrew:
PI spec has not defined such information. But, PPI implementation and PeiCore
needs to align new heap and stack layout. The full PPI should include new heap
base and new stack base. Current PPI has only one Base. Then, PPI
implementation needs mach PeiCore implementation.
Thanks
Limin
Reviewed by Thomas Palmer
-Original Message-
From: Jiaxin Wu [mailto:jiaxin...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 2:20 AM
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Palmer, Thomas ; Long Qin ; Ye
Ting ; Fu Siyuan
Subject: [staging/HTTPS-TLS][PATCH 0/2] Readme.MD and TlsAuthConfigDxe update
> On Aug 16, 2016, at 9:21 AM, Gao, Liming wrote:
>
> Andrew:
> arch value may be common. 3.3.1 Common Definitions, ::= {"IA32"}
> {"X64"} {"IPF"} {"EBC"} {} {"common"}.
> I agree [BuildOptions.AARCH64.common.DXE_RUNTIME_DRIVER should be supported.
> We will look it.
>
I agree but precede
Andrew:
arch value may be common. 3.3.1 Common Definitions, ::= {"IA32"}
{"X64"} {"IPF"} {"EBC"} {} {"common"}.
I agree [BuildOptions.AARCH64.common.DXE_RUNTIME_DRIVER should be supported.
We will look it.
Thanks
Liming
From: af...@apple.com [mailto:af...@apple.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 16
> On Aug 16, 2016, at 8:22 AM, Kurt Kennett wrote:
>
> Thanks for your help, Andre. I appreciate it. ☺
>
> [BuildOptions.AARCH64.common.DXE_RUNTIME_DRIVER]
> Does not work.
>
Can you file a bugzilla report on the tools, and another on the spec to mention
BuildOptions.AARCH64.common.DXE_RUNTI
Thanks for your help, Andre. I appreciate it. ☺
[BuildOptions.AARCH64.common.DXE_RUNTIME_DRIVER]
Does not work.
[BuildOptions.AARCH64.common.EDKII.DXE_RUNTIME_DRIVER]
Does not work.
[BuildOptions.common.EDKII.DXE_RUNTIME_DRIVER]
Works.
K2
From: af...@apple.com [mailto:af...@apple.com]
Sent: T
> On Aug 16, 2016, at 7:49 AM, Kurt Kennett wrote:
>
> Hi Liming. I’m a bit confused by your email.
>
> I my original email below, I reference directly:
>
> >> DSC spec (January 2016 1.26) says I can do this:
> >>
> >> (Section 3.6 pp 76)
>
> In this section it says:
>
> …
> Build optio
Hi Liming. I'm a bit confused by your email.
I my original email below, I reference directly:
>> DSC spec (January 2016 1.26) says I can do this:
>>
>> (Section 3.6 pp 76)
In this section it says:
...
Build options priority (appended from lowest to highest and/or highest
replacement) is:
* Hi
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Ye Ting
-Original Message-
From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Jiaxin Wu
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:47 AM
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Ye, Ting ; Fu, Siyuan ; Cohen
Eugene
Subject: [edk2] [Patch] MdeModulePkg: F
Series reviewed by: Ye Ting
-Original Message-
From: Wu, Jiaxin
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 3:20 PM
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Cc: Palmer Thomas ; Long, Qin ; Ye,
Ting ; Fu, Siyuan
Subject: [staging/HTTPS-TLS][PATCH 0/2] Readme.MD and TlsAuthConfigDxe update
Cc: Palmer Thomas
Cc
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu
Best Regards,
Hao Wu
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Ruiyu
> Ni
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 3:33 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Wu, Hao A
> Subject: [edk2] [PATCH] ShellPkg/Ls: Handle the case
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni
Cc: Hao Wu
---
ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellLevel2CommandsLib/Ls.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellLevel2CommandsLib/Ls.c
b/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellLevel2CommandsLib
Cc: Palmer Thomas
Cc: Long Qin
Cc: Ye Ting
Cc: Fu Siyuan
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu
Jiaxin Wu (2):
Readme.MD: Clarify the feature support scope
NetworkPkg/TlsAuthConfigDxe: TlsCaCertificate variable attribute update
NetworkPkg/TlsAut
Cc: Palmer Thomas
Cc: Long Qin
Cc: Ye Ting
Cc: Fu Siyuan
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu
---
Readme.MD | 8 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Readme.MD b/Readme.MD
index 2411042..389935e 100644
--- a/Readme.M
Remove the RT attribute for TlsCaCertificate variable protecting. If so,
we can treat this variable as security in certain case.
Cc: Palmer Thomas
Cc: Long Qin
Cc: Ye Ting
Cc: Fu Siyuan
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Wu
---
NetworkPkg/TlsAuthCon
Some notes for future reference, since this is already committed.
I think subject should have been something like:
MdePkg/ImageDecoder: Fix GUID conflict with PCI Root Bridge Protocol
When browsing commits with just the subject line, you should have a
good idea of what the commit is about. (For
30 matches
Mail list logo
