Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Guo Mang
---
.../PlatformFlashAccessLib.c | 638 +
.../PlatformFlashAccessLib.inf | 61 ++
.../SystemFirmwareDescriptor.acpi | Bin 0 -> 172 bytes
The PCD PcdFlashAreaBaseAddress should be 0xFF80, but it's 0xFFC0 due
to wrong value assignment in platform fdf.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Guo Mang
---
Vlv2TbltDevicePkg/PlatformDxe/Platform.c | 8
Vlv2TbltDevicePkg/PlatformDxe/
Rebecca:
Thanks for your catch issue. I will provide the patch to fix it. To be
compatible, I will keep EfiGcdMemoryTypePersistent and
EfiGcdMemoryTypePersistentMemory both.
Thanks
Liming
> -Original Message-
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
>
Move PlatformVTdSampleDxe to Feature/VTd/PlatformVTdSampleDxe.
Suggested-by: Star Zeng
Cc: Star Zeng
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao
---
IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/PlatformVTdSampleDxe/PlatformVTdSampleDxe.c
| 409
This patch is to address the feedback from Star.Zeng during code review.
We group 4 VTd related modules to Feature/VTd dir to better maintance.
No code update, only location move.
Suggested-by: Star Zeng
Cc: Star Zeng
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jiewe
Move PlatformIntelVTdInfoSamplePei to Feature/VTd/.
Suggested-by: Star Zeng
Cc: Star Zeng
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao
---
IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/PlatformVTdInfoSamplePei/PlatformVTdInfoSamplePei.c
| 65
I
Move IntelVTdPmrPei to Feature/VTd/IntelVTdPmrPei.
Suggested-by: Star Zeng
Cc: Star Zeng
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao
---
IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdPmrPei/IntelVTdPmr.c | 314
++
IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/Intel
Pankaj,
Thanks for the contribution.
Could you help update the title to be like MdeModulePkg SerialDxe: XX?
In fact, I agree the fix as it matches the code at
MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciSioSerialDxe/SerialIo.c and
IntelFrameworkModulePkg/Bus/Isa/IsaSerialDxe/Serial.c.
But I am curious abou
Hi Laszlo/Ruiyu/Star
I went through the whole conversation and have some thought:
For staging, I quote the description from
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2-staging
I think UDF matches all below criteria. "edk2 required quality criteria" is the
key.
We have lots of features there - such as St
Hi Laszlo and Ruiyu
I can think 1 possible alternative, for your consideration only.
1) Move the feature to OvmfPkg.
As such, it won't block us at this moment.
Once the UDF solution has good quality, we can move it back to MdeModulePkg.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler
Commit 8f0b62a5dac0 ("BaseTools/tools_def AARCH64: enable frame pointers
for DEBUG builds") removed the -fomit-frame-pointer switch from the
shared CFLAGS between AARCH64 DEBUG and RELEASE build, and move it to
the RELEASE specific ones, so that DEBUG builds can produce a backtrace
when a crash occ
Process any capsule HOBs that were left for us by CapsulePei. This
involves calling ProcessCapsules() twice, as explained in the comment
in DxeCapsuleLibFmp [sic].
1) The first call must be before EndOfDxe. The system capsules is processed.
If device capsule FMP protocols are exposted at this t
On 15 September 2017 at 03:13, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 08:02:34PM +0530, Meenakshi Aggarwal wrote:
>> From: Udit Kumar
>>
>> While creating Hob list, ArmPlatformPkg is hiding UEFI memory.
>> whereas this memory can be used by OS.
>>
>> This patch, allows OS to use UEFI code
Hi Hao,
On 15/09/2017 01:57, Hao Wu wrote:
The series introduces the following code refinements for UdfDxe &
PartitionDxe:
a. Add checks to ensure no possible NULL pointer dereference
b. Reslove operands of different size in bitwise operations
c. Use compare operator for non-boolean comparisons
I've noticed an inconsistency between the PI 1.6 specification and the
edk2 implementation of EFI_GCD_MEMORY_TYPE: PI says it's
EfiGcdMemoryTypePersistent while Pi/PiDxeCis.h has
EfiGcdMemoryTypePersistentMemory.
Since the EfiGcdMemoryTypePersistent is mentioned several times in the
spec I'm
On 09/15/17 18:40, Ni, Ruiyu wrote:
> Laszlo,
> Please do not add a PCD for this. Too many PCDs are no good to the project.
I understand that new MdeModulePkg PCDs are not liked, but what do you
propose instead? If we simply revert the PartitionDxe changes, then
people that want to experiment with
On 09/15/17 18:27, Paulo Alcantara wrote:
> Laszlo,
>
> On 15/09/2017 12:51, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 09/15/17 09:38, Ni, Ruiyu wrote:
>>> Paulo,
>>> Supporting multiple LVDs can be considered as a long-term task, or
>>> can be added
>>> per request.
>>> But I think a urgent fix in PartitionDxe d
Laszlo,
Please do not add a PCD for this. Too many PCDs are no good to the project.
发自我的 iPhone
> 在 2017年9月16日，上午12:27，Paulo Alcantara 写道：
>
> Laszlo,
>
>> On 15/09/2017 12:51, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> On 09/15/17 09:38, Ni, Ruiyu wrote:
>>> Paulo,
>>> Supporting multiple LVDs can be considered
Laszlo,
On 15/09/2017 12:51, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 09/15/17 09:38, Ni, Ruiyu wrote:
Paulo,
Supporting multiple LVDs can be considered as a long-term task, or can be added
per request.
But I think a urgent fix in PartitionDxe driver is to:
1. create child BLK only for the portion covered by the
On 15 September 2017 at 09:22, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 05:50:29PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Process any capsule HOBs that were left for us by CapsulePei. This
>> involves calling ProcessCapsules() twice, as explained in the comment
>> in DxeCapsuleLibFmp [sic].
>>
>> 1
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 05:50:29PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Process any capsule HOBs that were left for us by CapsulePei. This
> involves calling ProcessCapsules() twice, as explained in the comment
> in DxeCapsuleLibFmp [sic].
>
> 1) The first call must be before EndOfDxe. The system capsul
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 05:11:21PM +0100, evan.ll...@arm.com wrote:
> From: Sami Mujawar
I have fixed Sami's email address up before pushing.
> The ARMv8.2-FP16 extension introduces support for half precision
> floating point and the processor ID registers have been updated to
> enable detection
On 09/15/17 09:38, Ni, Ruiyu wrote:
> Paulo,
> Supporting multiple LVDs can be considered as a long-term task, or can be
> added
> per request.
> But I think a urgent fix in PartitionDxe driver is to:
> 1. create child BLK only for the portion covered by the LVD
> 2. Do not create child BLK for LV
Hey Dandan,
Sorry for the mistakes, I will send them a part of a V2 once you finished
reviewing.
No problem for the delay, it's not high priority at all. Thanks for reviewing
it!
There are problems within the specification regarding the SPI protocols anyway.
I wanted to report these, though I d
On 09/15/17 15:02, Ni, Ruiyu wrote:
> Agree with most of your words.
> Build farm is very needed for this case.
>
> But as I said in another mail, there is a bug (#707) in current implementation
> and I expect it to be fixed ASAP. Our QA is complaining!
I'm looking into it.
Laszlo
__
Hi Evan,
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 07:16:19PM +0100, evan.ll...@arm.com wrote:
> From: EvanLloyd
>
> There are a number of cases where it is desirable to remove unused code.
> An obvious instance might be on an emulator, where executing irrelevant
> code can add hours to the boot time. This chang
Really thanks for the contribution (by using your free time). :)
Please help take care the issue raised at
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2017-September/014694.html and
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707 with high priority,
and also the review request at
https://lists
Basically, people are totally encouraged and welcome to contribute, no one can
make sure his/her patch will never break anything.
I want to emphasize I was not challenging the code/people.
Staging branch does not mean it is unmaintained, here I do not want to argue
the position of Staging branch
On 09/15/2017 03:57 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
The other four virtio device drivers (VirtioBlkDxe, VirtioGpuDxe,
VirtioRngDxe, VirtioScsiDxe) log such messages at this point; follow suit.
Cc: Brijesh Singh
Cc: Jordan Justen
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by:
On 09/15/2017 03:57 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Document the following actions on the
EfiSimpleNetworkStarted <-> EfiSimpleNetworkInitialized
state transitions:
* from commit 46b11f00ac70 ("OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe: alloc RxBuf using
AllocateSharedPages()", 2017-09-14):
VirtioNetInitRx ->
Issue : When try to change serial attributes using sermode
command, the default values are set
Cause : The SerialReset command resets the attributes' values
to default
Fix : Serial Reset command should set the attributes which have
been changed by user after calling SerialSetAttributes.
Contribute
Agree with most of your words.
Build farm is very needed for this case.
But as I said in another mail, there is a bug (#707) in current implementation
and I expect it to be fixed ASAP. Our QA is complaining!
-Original Message-
From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, S
Laszlo,
I may not state the problem very clearly.
I saw two problems:
1. ParitionDxe shouldn't create BLK handle for the entire media again. Our QA
complains
several new but unexpected BLK devices are seen. This bug is easy to fix
and needs to
be fixed ASAP. So I created a BZ
(https://
On 09/15/17 09:38, Ni, Ruiyu wrote:
> Paulo,
> Supporting multiple LVDs can be considered as a long-term task, or can be
> added
> per request.
> But I think a urgent fix in PartitionDxe driver is to:
> 1. create child BLK only for the portion covered by the LVD
> 2. Do not create child BLK for LV
Hello All,
On 09/15/17 09:38, Ni, Ruiyu wrote:
> Paulo,
> Supporting multiple LVDs can be considered as a long-term task, or can be
> added
> per request.
> But I think a urgent fix in PartitionDxe driver is to:
> 1. create child BLK only for the portion covered by the LVD
> 2. Do not create chil
Hi Star,
On 09/15/17 08:14, Zeng, Star wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Based on recent issues about UDF since the code was pushed for
> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2017-September/014360.html, I
> want to raise some questions kindly.
>
> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2017-September/01440
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 08:02:34PM +0530, Meenakshi Aggarwal wrote:
> From: Udit Kumar
>
> While creating Hob list, ArmPlatformPkg is hiding UEFI memory.
> whereas this memory can be used by OS.
>
> This patch, allows OS to use UEFI code area.
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agree
Hello All,
Could you please anyone provide comment on this?
Thank you,
karunakar
From: Karunakar P
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 7:04 PM
To: 'edk2-devel@lists.01.org'
Subject: RE: RE: Failed to clear configuration in Ip4Config2 Protocol
Hello All,
I was trying to verify the feature "Allo
Hello all,
We have a Broadcom NIC card which doesn't support IPv6 (Ipv6Supported flag is
0).
1) But the HTTPv6 boot options are shown.
Unlike in PXE (PxeBcCheckIpv6Support()), the HTTP drivers in edk2 do not have a
condition check whether the card supports IPv6 or not.
2) If the card do
In
"Signal to the hardware that the End Of Intrrupt state has been reached."
Intrrupt -> Interrupt
From: edk2-devel on behalf of Leif Lindholm
Sent: 14 September 2017 17:42:24
To: Evan Lloyd
Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; nd; Ard Biesheuvel
Subject: Re: [edk2]
The other four virtio device drivers (VirtioBlkDxe, VirtioGpuDxe,
VirtioRngDxe, VirtioScsiDxe) log such messages at this point; follow suit.
Cc: Brijesh Singh
Cc: Jordan Justen
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek
---
OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe/Events.c
Document the following actions on the
EfiSimpleNetworkStarted <-> EfiSimpleNetworkInitialized
state transitions:
* from commit 46b11f00ac70 ("OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe: alloc RxBuf using
AllocateSharedPages()", 2017-09-14):
VirtioNetInitRx ->
{ VirtIo->AllocateSharedPages, VirtioMapAllBytesI
Repo: https://github.com/lersek/edk2.git
Branch: vnet_technotes_exitboot_after_map
Cc: Brijesh Singh
Cc: Jordan Justen
Laszlo Ersek (2):
OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe: document Rx/Tx allocs and mappings on
Init/Shutdown
OvmfPkg/VirtioNetDxe: log debug message in VirtioNetExitBoot()
OvmfPkg/V
From: Udit Kumar
While creating Hob list, ArmPlatformPkg is hiding UEFI memory.
whereas this memory can be used by OS.
This patch, allows OS to use UEFI code area.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Meenakshi Aggarwal
Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar
---
ArmPlatf
We met a case that use two microcode files in the Microcode.inf file,
one is .mcb file, another is .txt file. then it cause build failure
because the SourceFileList include the .txt file's output file, while
this output file is still not be generated, so it cause
GetFileDependency report failure.
Hi Marvin,
Thank you for your contribution. I am reviewing this patch now. Currently I
just take a look at the SMM SPI part and find:
1. There is a typo in LegacySpiSmmController.h
The definition should be EFI_LEGACY_SPI_SMM_CONTROLLER_GUID, not
EFI_LEGACY_SPI_SMM_FLASH_PROTOCOL_GUID.
Typo:
#de
Paulo,
Supporting multiple LVDs can be considered as a long-term task, or can be added
per request.
But I think a urgent fix in PartitionDxe driver is to:
1. create child BLK only for the portion covered by the LVD
2. Do not create child BLK for LVD that's actually an Eltorito LVD
I submitted a Bu
On September 15, 2017 4:10:10 AM GMT-03:00, "Ni, Ruiyu"
wrote:
>Paulo,
>Can current code support multiple volumes in CDROM?
No. It can handle only a single UDF logical volume. I think I never found an
UDF disk or image with more than a LVD (Logical Volume Descriptior). Although I
think I als
Paulo,
Can current code support multiple volumes in CDROM?
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Paulo Alcantara [mailto:pca...@zytor.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 2:26 PM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu ; Laszlo Ersek
> Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Wu, Hao A ; Zeng, Star
>
> Subject: RE: F
Star,
Eltorito file system access should work.
But UDF support may not work as expected if there are multiple
volumes in the CDROM.
Thanks/Ray
> -Original Message-
> From: Zeng, Star
> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 3:01 PM
> To: Paulo Alcantara ; Ni, Ruiyu ;
> Laszlo Ersek
> Cc: edk2-
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao
>-Original Message-
>From: Bi, Dandan
>Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 3:04 PM
>To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>Cc: Dong, Eric ; Gao, Liming
>Subject: [edk2-VfrSpecification PATCH V2] Add union data type and bit fields
>in VFR Data Struct Definition
>
>V2: Add a not
V2: Add a note in the doc:for the bit field, the number of
the bit width could not exceed 32.
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683
Cc: Eric Dong
Cc: Liming Gao
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Dandan Bi
Reviewed-by: Eric Dong
---
.../23_vf
How serious is this issue?
Only causing more BLKs are shown, but not impacting Eltorito? Or impacting
Eltorito definitely?
Thanks,
Star
-Original Message-
From: Paulo Alcantara [mailto:pca...@zytor.com]
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 2:26 PM
To: Ni, Ruiyu ; Laszlo Ersek
Cc: edk2-dev
53 matches
Mail list logo
