Hi Ben,
On 28.01.2018 09:49, You, Benjamin wrote:
> Hi Nico,
>
> Thanks for the detailed information. It makes sense. I do like the idea of
> documenting the lb_framebuffer.
>
>> The only guarantee for `bytes_per_pixel` (typo? 'bytes_per_scanline')
yes, typo.
>> and `x_resolution` you get as
Hello Ben,
On 27.01.2018 05:11, benjamin.you at intel.com (You, Benjamin) wrote:
> The functioning will depend on Coreboot interpreting properly too. However
> fixing the Payload will not cause any regression anyway.
I'm not sure what you mean by "interpreting properly". The
`bytes_per_line`
2 matches
Mail list logo
