gt; Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 7:41 PM
> To: Fan, Jeff; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Wu, Hao A; Kinney, Michael D; Tian, Feng
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Lock should be acquired
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On 04/18/17 04:16, Jeff Fan wrote:
>>
t: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Lock should be acquired
Hi Jeff,
On 04/18/17 04:16, Jeff Fan wrote:
> SMM BSP's *busy* state should be acquired. We could use
> AcquireSpinLock() instead of AcquireSpinLockOrFail().
>
> Cc: Hao Wu
> Cc: Feng Tian
> Cc: Michael
Hi Jeff,
On 04/18/17 04:16, Jeff Fan wrote:
> SMM BSP's *busy* state should be acquired. We could use AcquireSpinLock()
> instead of AcquireSpinLockOrFail().
>
> Cc: Hao Wu
> Cc: Feng Tian
> Cc: Michael Kinney
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Fan
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu
Best Regards,
Hao Wu
> -Original Message-
> From: Fan, Jeff
> Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 10:16 AM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Wu, Hao A; Tian, Feng; Kinney, Michael D
> Subject: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Lock should be acquired
>
> SMM BSP's *bu
SMM BSP's *busy* state should be acquired. We could use AcquireSpinLock()
instead of AcquireSpinLockOrFail().
Cc: Hao Wu
Cc: Feng Tian
Cc: Michael Kinney
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Jeff Fan
---
UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/MpService.c | 2 +-
1 file ch
5 matches
Mail list logo