On 03/13/17 21:39, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 03/13/17 15:59, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 13 March 2017 at 14:53, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> On 03/13/17 11:23, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 11 March 2017 at 10:26, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 08:38:19AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 13 March 2017 at 20:39, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 03/13/17 15:59, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 13 March 2017 at 14:53, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> On 03/13/17 11:23, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
On 11 March 2017 at 10:26, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 08:38:19AM +0100, Laszlo Ers
On 03/13/17 15:59, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 13 March 2017 at 14:53, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 03/13/17 11:23, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> On 11 March 2017 at 10:26, Leif Lindholm wrote:
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 08:38:19AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> "MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/S3SaveS
On 13 March 2017 at 14:53, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 03/13/17 11:23, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 11 March 2017 at 10:26, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>>> On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 08:38:19AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> "MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/S3SaveStateDxe/AcpiS3ContextSave.c". I
>> think th
On 03/13/17 11:23, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 11 March 2017 at 10:26, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 08:38:19AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> "MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/S3SaveStateDxe/AcpiS3ContextSave.c". I
> think the above check should be reworked to look for the FADT
On 11 March 2017 at 10:26, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 08:38:19AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> >> "MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/S3SaveStateDxe/AcpiS3ContextSave.c". I
>> >> think the above check should be reworked to look for the FADT
>> >> (EFI_ACPI_2_0_FIXED_ACPI_DESCRIPTION_T
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 08:38:19AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> >> "MdeModulePkg/Universal/Acpi/S3SaveStateDxe/AcpiS3ContextSave.c". I
> >> think the above check should be reworked to look for the FADT
> >> (EFI_ACPI_2_0_FIXED_ACPI_DESCRIPTION_TABLE_SIGNATURE) with code lifted
> >> from these helpe
On 03/11/17 10:19, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 11 March 2017 at 08:41, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 03/11/17 08:30, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>>
On 11 Mar 2017, at 08:21, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 03/11/17 06:55, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 03/09/17 17:04, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Ins
On 11 March 2017 at 08:41, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 03/11/17 08:30, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>
>>> On 11 Mar 2017, at 08:21, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>>
On 03/11/17 06:55, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 03/09/17 17:04, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Instead of having a build time switch to prevent the
On 03/11/17 08:30, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
>> On 11 Mar 2017, at 08:21, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/11/17 06:55, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 03/09/17 17:04, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Instead of having a build time switch to prevent the FDT configuration
table from being installed, make
On 03/11/17 07:57, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 11 March 2017 at 06:55, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 03/09/17 17:04, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> Instead of having a build time switch to prevent the FDT configuration
>>> table from being installed, make this behavior dependent on whether we
>>> are passin
> On 11 Mar 2017, at 08:21, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>
>> On 03/11/17 06:55, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> On 03/09/17 17:04, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> Instead of having a build time switch to prevent the FDT configuration
>>> table from being installed, make this behavior dependent on whether we
>>> are p
On 03/11/17 06:55, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 03/09/17 17:04, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Instead of having a build time switch to prevent the FDT configuration
>> table from being installed, make this behavior dependent on whether we
>> are passing ACPI tables to the OS. This is done by looking for the
On 11 March 2017 at 06:55, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 03/09/17 17:04, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> Instead of having a build time switch to prevent the FDT configuration
>> table from being installed, make this behavior dependent on whether we
>> are passing ACPI tables to the OS. This is done by lookin
On 03/09/17 17:04, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Instead of having a build time switch to prevent the FDT configuration
> table from being installed, make this behavior dependent on whether we
> are passing ACPI tables to the OS. This is done by looking for the
> ACPI 2.0 configuration table, and only in
On 03/09/17 17:04, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Instead of having a build time switch to prevent the FDT configuration
> table from being installed, make this behavior dependent on whether we
> are passing ACPI tables to the OS. This is done by looking for the
> ACPI 2.0 configuration table, and only in
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 05:04:01PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Instead of having a build time switch to prevent the FDT configuration
> table from being installed, make this behavior dependent on whether we
> are passing ACPI tables to the OS. This is done by looking for the
> ACPI 2.0 configura
Instead of having a build time switch to prevent the FDT configuration
table from being installed, make this behavior dependent on whether we
are passing ACPI tables to the OS. This is done by looking for the
ACPI 2.0 configuration table, and only installing the FDT one if the
ACPI one cannot be fo
18 matches
Mail list logo
