The function description comments should be not related to this patch.
I am ok with or without updating the comments in this patch.
Reviewed-by: Star Zeng .
Thanks,
Star
-Original Message-
From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2018 7:06 PM
To: Wang,
On 08/08/18 09:04, Wang, Jian J wrote:
> Hi Ruiyu,
>
> In function description comments, the @retval doesn't match the changes in
> this patch.
>
> With those changes,
> Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang
Same from my side,
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek
Thanks!
Laszlo
>> -Original Message-
>>
Hi Ruiyu,
In function description comments, the @retval doesn't match the changes in this
patch.
With those changes,
Reviewed-by: Jian J Wang
Regards,
Jian
> -Original Message-
> From: Ni, Ruiyu
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2018 1:28 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Zeng,
Commit b22a62be5cdc8fd19d87ec1ecfa5b28fb9be50ad
* IntelFrameworkModule/LegacyBios:Use reserved memory for legacy data
allocates reserved memory for holding legacy code/data.
But with PcdDxeNxMemoryProtectionPolicy set to certain value to
forbid execution when code is in certain type of memory,
4 matches
Mail list logo