On 09/30/16 08:56, Gao, Liming wrote:
> Ersek:
>
> I try O2 option. Compared to Ofast, there is a little different. I
> think it is acceptable. I will use O2 option. And, this warning message
> also exists without O2 enable. It is not introduced by this patch.
>
>
>
> Tool
, 2016 8:24 AM
To: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>
Cc: Justen, Jordan L <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>; edk2-de...@ml01.01.org; Ard
Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [edk2] [Patch 4/4] BaseTools Makefile: Enable Ofast option for GCC
tool chain
Laszlo:
Thanks for
d.biesheu...@linaro.org>; Justen,
Jordan L <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2] [Patch 4/4] BaseTools Makefile: Enable Ofast option for GCC
tool chain
Hi Liming,
On 09/29/16 16:12, Liming Gao wrote:
> Enable Ofast option to generate fast code for performance improvement.
Hi Liming,
On 09/29/16 16:12, Liming Gao wrote:
> Enable Ofast option to generate fast code for performance improvement.
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Liming Gao
> ---
> BaseTools/Source/C/Makefiles/header.makefile | 6 +++---
Enable Ofast option to generate fast code for performance improvement.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao
---
BaseTools/Source/C/Makefiles/header.makefile | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
5 matches
Mail list logo