Re: [edk2] [RFC v1 00/15] *** Proposal for StandaloneMmPkg ***

2018-04-07 Thread Yao, Jiewen
@lists.01.org > Cc: leif.lindh...@linaro.org; Achin Gupta <achin.gu...@arm.com> > Subject: RE: [edk2] [RFC v1 00/15] *** Proposal for StandaloneMmPkg *** > > Jiewen, > > My response inline for some of the comments. > I have posted new series of patches. Please review them

Re: [edk2] [RFC v1 00/15] *** Proposal for StandaloneMmPkg ***

2018-04-06 Thread Supreeth Venkatesh
th.venkat...@arm.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org Cc: leif.lindh...@linaro.org Subject: RE: [edk2] [RFC v1 00/15] *** Proposal for StandaloneMmPkg *** Thanks you very much. Thanks for your patient. I have reviewed https://github.com/supven01/edk2.git (Branch: AArch64StandaloneMm) Below is my t

Re: [edk2] [RFC v1 00/15] *** Proposal for StandaloneMmPkg ***

2017-12-04 Thread Supreeth Venkatesh
To: Supreeth Venkatesh <supreeth.venkat...@arm.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org Cc: leif.lindh...@linaro.org Subject: RE: [edk2] [RFC v1 00/15] *** Proposal for StandaloneMmPkg *** Thanks you very much. Thanks for your patient. I have reviewed https://github.com/supven01/edk2.git (Branch: AArch64Standa

Re: [edk2] [RFC v1 00/15] *** Proposal for StandaloneMmPkg ***

2017-12-03 Thread Yao, Jiewen
5.9) For "StandaloneMmPkg: Add handler to handle event received from "uefiinfo"." Looks good. Thank you Yao Jiewen > -Original Message- > From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of > Supreeth Venkatesh > Sent: Friday, Dec

Re: [edk2] [RFC v1 00/15] *** Proposal for StandaloneMmPkg ***

2017-11-30 Thread Supreeth Venkatesh
On Tue, 2017-11-28 at 07:00 +, Yao, Jiewen wrote: > HI > I am sorry that I missed this mail before. > > I found only 0/15 and 13/15 are in my mail box. :-( > I do not know why others are filtered. This was deliberate as PATCH 13/15 implements MM core code. Rest of them are/were AARCH64

Re: [edk2] [RFC v1 00/15] *** Proposal for StandaloneMmPkg ***

2017-11-27 Thread Yao, Jiewen
HI I am sorry that I missed this mail before. I found only 0/15 and 13/15 are in my mail box. :-( I do not know why others are filtered. Is that possible to post the whole patch to your private git? As such, we can review it in more efficient way. Basically, I think it is a good idea to have

Re: [edk2] [RFC v1 00/15] *** Proposal for StandaloneMmPkg ***

2017-11-20 Thread Supreeth Venkatesh
naro.org Subject: Re: [edk2] [RFC v1 00/15] *** Proposal for StandaloneMmPkg *** Could there be any confusion between 'MM' meaning Management Mode and Memory Management? -- Rebecca On 11/17/2017 4:07 PM, Supreeth Venkatesh wrote: > *** > PI Specification v1.5 "Volume 4: Managemen

Re: [edk2] [RFC v1 00/15] *** Proposal for StandaloneMmPkg ***

2017-11-18 Thread Rebecca Cran
Could there be any confusion between 'MM' meaning Management Mode and Memory Management? -- Rebecca On 11/17/2017 4:07 PM, Supreeth Venkatesh wrote: *** PI Specification v1.5 "Volume 4: Management Mode Core Interface" introduces the concept of MM Standalone Mode. Initialization of this

[edk2] [RFC v1 00/15] *** Proposal for StandaloneMmPkg ***

2017-11-17 Thread Supreeth Venkatesh
*** PI Specification v1.5 "Volume 4: Management Mode Core Interface" introduces the concept of MM Standalone Mode. Initialization of this mode can be done during the SEC phase (Section 1.5.2). On ARMv8-A systems, ARM Trusted Firmware is responsible for launching the normal world firmware e.g.