On 22.02.15 01:03, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 22 February 2015 at 02:19, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> So, before I try to reason more about code that's potentially not
>> covered by this patch, let me ask this -- is it conceivable that in the
>> following:
>>
>> //
>> // child
On 22 February 2015 at 02:19, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> So, before I try to reason more about code that's potentially not
> covered by this patch, let me ask this -- is it conceivable that in the
> following:
>
> //
> // child base cpu base
> //type add
(CC'ing Will Deacon, author of "drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c")
On 02/21/15 18:19, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Alex,
[...]
> I'm having second thoughts if the translation in this patch covers
> everything. I'm wondering if the translation should also be done for the
> gDS->XxxxMemorySpace() call
Alex,
On 02/18/15 22:08, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Unlike the one in PcAtChipsetPkg, our PciHostBridgeDxe module must handle
> address space translation. IO and MMIO addresses expressed in the
> respective apertures may be mapped to different bases in CPU address
> space, and in case of IO, they actua
