Hello,
I'm having an issue with macro expansion in DEC files, I am not understanding
why the macro OUTPUT_DIRECTORY is not being expanded under the [includes]
section. I have generated some headers into the build directory, which can be
changed to a different location and this location is pass
On 02/28/15 10:22, Gao, Liming wrote:
> Laszlo:
> So, your proposal is to change line 1158if ((Entry->BaseAddress +
> Length) > MaxAddress) { ==>if ((Entry->BaseAddress + Length - 1) >
> MaxAddress) {?
Yes, it is.
I didn't write a patch up-front because the code change is eas
On 02/28/15 08:58, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 27 February 2015 at 22:55, Kinney, Michael D
> wrote:
>> Laszlo,
>>
>> You are welcome to apply the patch set. Thanks for helping.
>>
>
> Thanks everyone
>
> I have updated the public branch with Michael's R-b and rebased onto
> the latest upstream
> On Feb 27, 2015, at 11:18 PM, Gao, Liming wrote:
>
> PI spec doesn’t define the clear rule. So, this is not PeiCore compliant
> issue.
> Like Jiewen say, Early PEIM that run before CAR down can consume data from
> PPI and publish HOB. It should be platform PEIM, because we can’t assure the
Laszlo:
So, your proposal is to change line 1158if ((Entry->BaseAddress +
Length) > MaxAddress) { ==>if ((Entry->BaseAddress + Length - 1) >
MaxAddress) {?
Thanks
Liming
-Original Message-
From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015
On 27 February 2015 at 22:55, Kinney, Michael D
wrote:
> Laszlo,
>
> You are welcome to apply the patch set. Thanks for helping.
>
Thanks everyone
I have updated the public branch with Michael's R-b and rebased onto
the latest upstream (1 minor merge conflict)
Regards,
Ard,
> -Original M
