Feng, you were correct that we don't need the 2nd Prp list for such case(
case 3) and the last entry in the first Prp list points to last 4K range
rather than a pointer to next Prp List). Which is inline with NVMe spec.
*Excerpt from NVM Express 1.1, section 4.3:*
The first PRP entry contained wi
Jones:
EFI System Resource Table is a GUID definition. We suggest using a separate
head file to include its definition and place this header file into
MdePkg/Include/Guid directory.
And, you also add a protocol definition to manage its contents. But, I can't
find this protocol from UEFI spe
Jones:
UEFI spec defines this table format. And, for the a capsule with
CAPSULE_FLAGS_POPULATE_SYSTEM_TABLE flag, the firmware should install this
system table for it. So, I don't agree this change.
UEFI spec 7.5.3 Update Capsule:
A capsule which has the CAPSULE_FLAGS_POPULATE_SYSTEM_TABLE Fl
Martin:
Yes. We will use Mike patch to be consistent with other places.
I will add Tested-by: Olivier Martin
Thanks
Liming
-Original Message-
From: Olivier Martin [mailto:olivier.mar...@arm.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 7:24 PM
To: Laszlo Ersek; Kinney, Michael D
Cc: edk2-deve
On 13 April 2015 at 17:24, Olivier Martin wrote:
> Reviewed-By: Olivier Martin
>
Thanks! So, since the breakage caused by this patch has apparently
been solved, are you ok to merge this?
I have updated my public branch:
https://git.linaro.org/people/ard.biesheuvel/uefi-next.git/shortlog/refs/he
Reviewed-By: Olivier Martin
-Original Message-
From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org]
Sent: 09 April 2015 12:29
To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; ler...@redhat.com; Olivier Martin
Cc: roy.fr...@linaro.org; leif.lindh...@linaro.org; Ard Biesheuvel
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/
Reviewed-by: Olivier Martin
-Original Message-
From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org]
Sent: 09 April 2015 12:29
To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; ler...@redhat.com; Olivier Martin
Cc: roy.fr...@linaro.org; leif.lindh...@linaro.org; Ard Biesheuvel
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/
