[edk2] SMI Handler

2013-03-01 Thread Ramesh Raju
Hi, What would be advantage/Disadvantage by forcing SMI handler always executed by BSP ( Setting PcdCpuSmmEnableBspElection to TRUE and FALSE)? Thanks, Ramesh The information contained in this message may be confidential and proprietary to American Megatrends, Inc. This communication is inte

[edk2] Windows Device Firmware Update.

2013-02-18 Thread Ramesh Raju
Hi, Does anybody has the sample Capsule package that has both DXE driver and Firmware image on it? I mean both windows 8 INF file, Capsule Package to update the device firmware. I mean do we have same driver to test the below function? 1) Device firmware capsule will have both DXE driver( R

Re: [edk2] Protocol Uninstall

2012-12-03 Thread Ramesh Raju
Thanks Andrew for your reply. Regards, Ramesh From: Andrew Fish [af...@apple.com] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 12:47 PM To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [edk2] Protocol Uninstall On Dec 2, 2012, at 10:21 PM, Ramesh Raju wrote: Andrew

Re: [edk2] Protocol Uninstall

2012-12-02 Thread Ramesh Raju
n that can be used to notify that the protocol is being removed. You could make a library that hides the implementation of this mechanism. Hope this helps, Andrew Fish On Dec 1, 2012, at 7:27 AM, Ramesh Raju wrote: Hi Andrew, I mean We have only RegisterProtocolNotify function defined i

Re: [edk2] Protocol Uninstall

2012-12-01 Thread Ramesh Raju
Model. Thanks, Ramesh From: Andrew Fish [af...@apple.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 3:12 AM To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [edk2] Protocol Uninstall On Nov 26, 2012, at 10:54 PM, Ramesh Raju wrote: All, Whenever protocol inst

[edk2] Protocol Uninstall

2012-11-26 Thread Ramesh Raju
All, Whenever protocol installed we have RegisterProtocolNotify function to get the Callback. I don't see any notification event if the protocol is uninstalled. Is there any reason for that? We could get a callback if the protocol is uninstalled only if we use driver binding method (EFI_OP

Re: [edk2] AHCI ports numeration

2012-11-05 Thread Ramesh Raju
implemented, the upper “for loop” will continue to detect, just not enter the if statement. That’s proposed change, please compared with trunk code. From: Ramesh Raju [mailto:rame...@ami.com] Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 13:00 To: 'edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net' Subject: Re: [

Re: [edk2] AHCI ports numeration

2012-11-04 Thread Ramesh Raju
[mailto:isakov...@bk.ru]<mailto:[mailto:isakov...@bk.ru]> Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 17:38 To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Subject: Re: [edk2] AHCI ports numeration Good idea, I like it! On 03.11.2012, at 6:46, Ramesh Raju mailto:ram

Re: [edk2] Both legacy OpROM and UEFI BSD loaded

2012-11-02 Thread Ramesh Raju
In which case please if the OpROM is for a storage class device? Thanks, Tao On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Ramesh Raju mailto:rame...@ami.com>> wrote: There is a case that CsmBlockio is not handling the option rom. Thanks, Ramesh From: Tao Yuan

Re: [edk2] AHCI ports numeration

2012-11-02 Thread Ramesh Raju
Number of Ports (NPS) — RO. Indicates number of supported ports. Note that the number of ports indicated in this field may be more than the number of ports indicated in the PI (ABAR + 0Ch) register. It says number of port implemented, it's not maxportnumber. so the for loop should be like belo

Re: [edk2] Both legacy OpROM and UEFI BSD loaded

2012-11-01 Thread Ramesh Raju
There is a case that CsmBlockio is not handling the option rom. Thanks, Ramesh From: Tao Yuan [yuanta...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 11:10 AM To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [edk2] Both legacy OpROM and UEFI BSD loaded Bloc

Re: [edk2] EFI_FILE_PROTOCOL.Delete() failing with EFI_WARN_DELETE_FAILURE

2012-10-25 Thread Ramesh Raju
May I know how file is declared? (*file)->Delete (*file); We are using like EFI_FILE_HANDLE file; (file)->Delete (file); and it works fine. Does the DEL command works from Shell? Thanks, Ramesh The information contained in this message may be confidential and proprietary to American Megatr

Re: [edk2] Both legacy OpROM and UEFI BSD loaded

2012-10-25 Thread Ramesh Raju
routines of OptionROM and BSD be called every time before the switch happens? And whether the system firmware make sure both the services will not be used at same time? Thanks Sathya From: Ramesh Raju [mailto:rame...@ami.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 10:32 PM To: 'edk2-

Re: [edk2] Both legacy OpROM and UEFI BSD loaded

2012-10-24 Thread Ramesh Raju
Sathya, I assume that both the images are packed in single option rom. Normal case will be, load only one image from option rom. But it's really depend on the UEFI firmware. They might loaded both the images to support both UEFI and Legacy OS booting. Thanks, Ramesh From: Prakash, Sathya [