Hi,
What would be advantage/Disadvantage by forcing SMI handler always executed
by BSP ( Setting PcdCpuSmmEnableBspElection to TRUE and FALSE)?
Thanks,
Ramesh
The information contained in this message may be confidential and proprietary
to American Megatrends, Inc. This communication is inte
Hi,
Does anybody has the sample Capsule package that has both DXE driver and
Firmware image on it? I mean both windows 8 INF file, Capsule Package to update
the device firmware.
I mean do we have same driver to test the below function?
1) Device firmware capsule will have both DXE driver( R
Thanks Andrew for your reply.
Regards,
Ramesh
From: Andrew Fish [af...@apple.com]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 12:47 PM
To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [edk2] Protocol Uninstall
On Dec 2, 2012, at 10:21 PM, Ramesh Raju wrote:
Andrew
n that can be used to
notify that the protocol is being removed.
You could make a library that hides the implementation of this mechanism.
Hope this helps,
Andrew Fish
On Dec 1, 2012, at 7:27 AM, Ramesh Raju wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I mean We have only RegisterProtocolNotify function defined i
Model.
Thanks,
Ramesh
From: Andrew Fish [af...@apple.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 3:12 AM
To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [edk2] Protocol Uninstall
On Nov 26, 2012, at 10:54 PM, Ramesh Raju wrote:
All,
Whenever protocol inst
All,
Whenever protocol installed we have RegisterProtocolNotify function to get
the Callback. I don't see any notification event if the protocol is
uninstalled. Is there any reason for that? We could get a callback if the
protocol is uninstalled only if we use driver binding method
(EFI_OP
implemented, the upper “for loop”
will continue to detect, just not enter the if statement.
That’s proposed change, please compared with trunk code.
From: Ramesh Raju [mailto:rame...@ami.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 13:00
To: 'edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: Re: [
[mailto:isakov...@bk.ru]<mailto:[mailto:isakov...@bk.ru]>
Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 17:38
To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [edk2] AHCI ports numeration
Good idea, I like it!
On 03.11.2012, at 6:46, Ramesh Raju mailto:ram
In which case please if the OpROM is for a storage class device?
Thanks,
Tao
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Ramesh Raju
mailto:rame...@ami.com>> wrote:
There is a case that CsmBlockio is not handling the option rom.
Thanks,
Ramesh
From: Tao Yuan
Number of Ports (NPS) — RO. Indicates number of supported ports. Note that the
number of ports indicated in this field may be more than the number of ports
indicated in the PI (ABAR + 0Ch) register.
It says number of port implemented, it's not maxportnumber.
so the for loop should be like belo
There is a case that CsmBlockio is not handling the option rom.
Thanks,
Ramesh
From: Tao Yuan [yuanta...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 11:10 AM
To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [edk2] Both legacy OpROM and UEFI BSD loaded
Bloc
May I know how file is declared?
(*file)->Delete (*file);
We are using like
EFI_FILE_HANDLE file;
(file)->Delete (file); and it works fine.
Does the DEL command works from Shell?
Thanks,
Ramesh
The information contained in this message may be confidential and proprietary
to American Megatr
routines of OptionROM and BSD be called every time before the switch happens?
And whether the system firmware make sure both the services will not be used at
same time?
Thanks
Sathya
From: Ramesh Raju [mailto:rame...@ami.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 10:32 PM
To: 'edk2-
Sathya,
I assume that both the images are packed in single option rom. Normal case
will be, load only one image from option rom. But it's really depend on the
UEFI firmware. They might loaded both the images to support both UEFI and
Legacy OS booting.
Thanks,
Ramesh
From: Prakash, Sathya [
14 matches
Mail list logo