; linaro-u...@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] Don't require optional ISCSI negotiation responses.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Ye, Ting wrote:
> Hi Franz,
>
> Thanks for providing the patch. We agree with the update and will check in
> your patch recently.
&
:feng.t...@intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 8:30 AM
> To: Roy Franz; edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; linaro-u...@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] Don't require optional ISCSI negotiation
> responses.
>
> Thanks, Franz
>
> We are reviewing this patc
[mailto:feng.t...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 8:30 AM
To: Roy Franz; edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; linaro-u...@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] Don't require optional ISCSI negotiation responses.
Thanks, Franz
We are reviewing this patch and will get back to you if we
Thanks, Franz
We are reviewing this patch and will get back to you if we have comments.
Thanks
Feng
-Original Message-
From: Roy Franz [mailto:roy.fr...@linaro.org]
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2015 09:12
To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; linaro-u...@lists.linaro.org; Tian, Feng
Cc:
Some simple value negotiation responses are optional,
in particular DataPDUInOrder and DataSequenceInOrder.
If we send "Yes", then the response from the target
is optional, and the Linux target implementation does
not return a response.
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signe
