On Jun 21, 2013, at 3:14 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Ryan Harkin wrote:
>> From: Leif Lindholm
>>
>> Currently, only ".efi" files are recognized as valid ARM UEFI
>> applications by BDS. This patch also makes ".EFI" files recognised.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Leif L
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Ryan Harkin wrote:
> From: Leif Lindholm
>
> Currently, only ".efi" files are recognized as valid ARM UEFI
> applications by BDS. This patch also makes ".EFI" files recognised.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm
> ---
> ArmPlatformPkg/Bds/BdsHelper.c |3 +++
>
On 21 June 2013 11:02, Olivier Martin wrote:
> I committed this change after fixing the coding style (revision 14437).
Yes, your revised version is more appropriate. Thanks.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ryan Harkin [mailto:ryan.har...@linaro.org]
>> Sent: 21 June 2013 09:05
>> To:
I committed this change after fixing the coding style (revision 14437).
> -Original Message-
> From: Ryan Harkin [mailto:ryan.har...@linaro.org]
> Sent: 21 June 2013 09:05
> To: ryan.har...@linaro.org; edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net;
> patc...@linaro.org; boot-architect...@lists.linaro.o
From: Leif Lindholm
Currently, only ".efi" files are recognized as valid ARM UEFI
applications by BDS. This patch also makes ".EFI" files recognised.
Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm
---
ArmPlatformPkg/Bds/BdsHelper.c |3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/ArmPlatformPkg/Bds/Bds
