On 02/28/15 08:58, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 27 February 2015 at 22:55, Kinney, Michael D
> wrote:
>> Laszlo,
>>
>> You are welcome to apply the patch set. Thanks for helping.
>>
>
> Thanks everyone
>
> I have updated the public branch with Michael's R-b and rebased onto
> the latest upstream
On 27 February 2015 at 22:55, Kinney, Michael D
wrote:
> Laszlo,
>
> You are welcome to apply the patch set. Thanks for helping.
>
Thanks everyone
I have updated the public branch with Michael's R-b and rebased onto
the latest upstream (1 minor merge conflict)
Regards,
Ard,
> -Original M
Laszlo,
You are welcome to apply the patch set. Thanks for helping.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 1:02 PM
To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Olivier Martin; Laszlo Ersek; Justen,
Jordan L; Kinney, Mic
Ard,
The updated patch looks good.
Reviewed-by: Michael Kinney
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 12:50 AM
To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; olivier.mar...@arm.com;
ler...@redhat.com; Justen,
On 26 February 2015 at 08:50, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> This is the latest version of the InterlockedCompareExchange16() patch.
> Michael has kindly confirmed (thanks Michael) that it does the right
> thing for IPF, but also spotted some issues with the Intel asm versions.
>
> The pat
Hello all,
This is the latest version of the InterlockedCompareExchange16() patch.
Michael has kindly confirmed (thanks Michael) that it does the right
thing for IPF, but also spotted some issues with the Intel asm versions.
The patch below has the fixes suggested by Michael applied.
I thought t
