Hi, Loukas
Thank you! I will wait for your build result.
Jeff
From: e...@ragequ.it [mailto:e...@ragequ.it]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 12:01 PM
To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [edk2] Building on OS X
Hey Jeff,
I haven't forgotten about this. I had a catastrophi
gon,
>
> Could you take a try on this patch to check if it could pass build?
>
> Thanks!
> Jeff
>
> From: e...@ragequ.it [mailto:e...@ragequ.it]
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 2:39 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [edk2] Building on OS X
&g
Egon,
Could you take a try on this patch to check if it could pass build?
Thanks!
Jeff
From: e...@ragequ.it [mailto:e...@ragequ.it]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 2:39 PM
To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [edk2] Building on OS X
Hi Jeff,
After applying the patch the `lret
ff
> From: Andrew Fish [mailto:af...@apple.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 6:50 AM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [edk2] Building on OS X
>
>
> On Jun 19, 2014, at 2:51 PM, Andrew Fish wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jun 19, 2014, at 2:39 PM
apple.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 6:50 AM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [edk2] Building on OS X
>
>
> On Jun 19, 2014, at 2:51 PM, Andrew Fish wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jun 19, 2014, at 2:39 PM, Reza Jelveh wrote:
>
>
> On 19/06/14 13
Hey guys,
Thanks for the tips.
On 20 Jun 2014, at 8:49 am, Andrew Fish wrote:
>
> On Jun 19, 2014, at 2:51 PM, Andrew Fish wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jun 19, 2014, at 2:39 PM, Reza Jelveh wrote:
>>
>>> On 19/06/14 13:59, Andrew Fish wrote:
On Jun 19, 2014, at 11:58 AM, e...@ragequ.it wr
...@apple.com]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 6:50 AM
To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [edk2] Building on OS X
On Jun 19, 2014, at 2:51 PM, Andrew Fish
mailto:af...@apple.com>> wrote:
On Jun 19, 2014, at 2:39 PM, Reza Jelveh
mailto:reza.jel...@tuhh.de>> wrote:
On 19/06/14 1
On Jun 19, 2014, at 2:51 PM, Andrew Fish wrote:
>
> On Jun 19, 2014, at 2:39 PM, Reza Jelveh wrote:
>
>> On 19/06/14 13:59, Andrew Fish wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 19, 2014, at 11:58 AM, e...@ragequ.it wrote:
>>>
I changed the `retf` to a `ret` to get it to assemble for now.
>>>
>>> T
On Jun 19, 2014, at 3:06 PM, Reza Jelveh wrote:
> On 19/06/14 14:51, Andrew Fish wrote:
>> Well the code looked like this? So I assumed they did not mean iret
>>.byte 0x48 # prefix to composite "retq" with next "retf"
>>retf # far return
>> DoIret:
>>
On 19/06/14 14:51, Andrew Fish wrote:
> Well the code looked like this? So I assumed they did not mean iret
> .byte 0x48 # prefix to composite "retq" with next "retf"
> retf # far return
> DoIret:
> iretq
i'm not sure what you mean ...
retf is lret
On Jun 19, 2014, at 2:39 PM, Reza Jelveh wrote:
> On 19/06/14 13:59, Andrew Fish wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 19, 2014, at 11:58 AM, e...@ragequ.it wrote:
>>
>>> I changed the `retf` to a `ret` to get it to assemble for now.
>>>
>>
>> That looks right. I think it should be ret.
> i'm pretty certain t
On 19/06/14 13:59, Andrew Fish wrote:
>
> On Jun 19, 2014, at 11:58 AM, e...@ragequ.it wrote:
>
> > I changed the `retf` to a `ret` to get it to assemble for now.
> >
>
> That looks right. I think it should be ret.
i'm pretty certain this should be lret. Basically either the osx assembler
shoul
On Jun 19, 2014, at 11:58 AM, e...@ragequ.it wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I’m having some issues building OVMF on OS X 10.9 with the latest dev tools.
> I’m running Xcode 5.1.1, with the “Late June” Command Line Tools.
>
> $ clang --version
> Apple LLVM version 5.1 (clang-503.0.40) (based on LLVM 3.
Hey guys,
I’m having some issues building OVMF on OS X 10.9 with the latest dev tools.
I’m running Xcode 5.1.1, with the “Late June” Command Line Tools.
$ clang --version
Apple LLVM version 5.1 (clang-503.0.40) (based on LLVM 3.4svn)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin13.0.0
Thread model: posix
Issue #
14 matches
Mail list logo
